7926

• UCREFRP Catalog Number: 7926
• Author: Annear, T. C. and A. L. Conder.
• Title: Relative Bias of Several Fisheries Instream Flow Methods.
• USFW Year: n.d.
• USFW - Doc Type: Cheyenne, Wyoming.
• Copyright Material: NO

fishery resources.

Publication Number 1829,. Oak Ridge Nat

Laboratory, Environmental Science Division, Oak Ridge,

Milhous, R. 1978. A computer program for the determination of

and shape parameters of a stream cross section.

Was hing ton S ta te

Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington, USA.

Nehring, R. 1979.

Evaluation of instream flow methods and determination of

water quantity needs for streams in the State of Colorado. Colorado

Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

Nelson, F. 1980.

Evaluation of four ins tream flow methods applied to four

trout rivers in southwest Montana.

Report to USFWS. Contract Number

14-16-0006-78-48.

Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife; and Parks.

Bozeman, Montana, USA.

Prewitt, C., and C. Carlson. 1979.

Evaluation of four instream flow

methodologies used on the Yampa and White rivers, Colorado.

Prepared

for Bureau of Land Management and Western Energy Land Use Team.

Contract Number YA-S12-CT6-i.

Department. of Fishery Biology,

Colorado State'University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

Rose, K., and C. Johnson. 1976.

The relative merits of the modified sag-tape

dete1mining
Wildlife Service,' Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

method

for

instream

flow

requirements.

U.s.

Fish and

Snedecor, G., and W. Cochran.

1971.

S ta tis tical me thods.

The I<r!~~S ta te

University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
I

20