Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ ~ ,.,......,.;.~ ..:..;..., , "-.--, -..--<.".:~;:.' -~-",;;;,~,:.~~,;,;~;' ''.:~ " <br /> <br /> <br />,.:.:Ji.;;;;;::.Jl;'M'i. <br /> <br />: . <br /> <br />\ --;".;,:,. <br /> <br />C0MPUTATIO~J OF ANNUAL SED1~\E~n LOADS <br />AT SELECTED STREAMFLO\i-GAG I NG STAT IONS <br /> <br />Pwailable Data <br /> <br />The streamflow and sediment data aval lable at 17 stream-gaging stations <br />within the YaGpa River basin are summarized in table 1. The records of daily <br />mean streamflow for the gaging stations used in this study are for periods,of <br />different lengths and differ-er,t times. In general, however, the s_,tre2mflow <br />records used I^.'ere sufficient to approximate the) ong'-term average'1R-agn i tude <br />and frequency of streamflm'/s, assuming tha.t there is no long-term -'trend in <br />the annual streamflow time ~~riei. The gaging station on the ~ampa'Ri~er at <br />Steamboat Springs (fig. 1) has- the 10ngesJ, ,streamflow"record in the basin. <br />The annual time series of trus record-vIas tested using a technique developed <br />by Conover (19~-e~ the results indicate there was no long-term trend in <br />s t reamf 1 ow. - <br /> <br />The sediment-load records summarized in table 1 include data for only <br />the suspended part of the total-sedi~ent load transported by streamflow at <br />these stations. The sediment load of a river is commonly divided, for <br />computation purposes, into two fractions--the suspended load and the bedload. <br />The suspended load is composed of the relatively finer sediment particles <br />which are transported within the streamflo\~. The bedload is co~posed or the <br />relatively coarser sediment particles which move along the bed or the stream. <br />The concentration of suspended sediment in the streamflow is measured by <br />collecting a discharge-weighted sample of the streamflow. The suspended- <br />sediment load for a given period may be computed by multiplying the mean <br />suspended-sediment concentration by the mean discharge and then by 0.0027 <br />times the number of days in the period. All sediment-load data included in <br />the records 1 isted in table 1 were computed in this manner. These data do <br />not include the bedload fraction. Although the bedload-transport rate may be <br />sampled separately, no bedload-transport measurements have been 8ade in the <br />Yampa River basin. Because the bedload fraction may be a substantia] part of <br />the total-sediment load in many rivers, it is desirable to obtain an estimate <br />of the bedload fraction. As wi 11 be discussed later, the bedload-transport <br />rate at each station was computed from a bedload-transport formula. <br /> <br />Dai ly suspended-sediment loads have been measured at only two gag1ng <br />stations in the Yampa River basin for periods longer than a few months. <br />These stations are the Yampa River near Maybell, Colo., rrom December 1950 <br />through ~1ay 1958, and the Little Snake River near Lily, Colo., from May' 1958 <br />through September 1964. Annual sediment loads for these gaging stations may <br />be calculated by summing the measured dai ly sediment IOdds. A reasonable <br />estimate of the mean-annual sediment load may be calculated by averaging the <br />measured annual sediment loads at each of these two sites. The period or <br />record at both ga~ing stations, however, is short relative to the observed <br />year-to-year streamflow variation. <br /> <br />The gaging stations on the Yampa River near Maybe] 1 and the Little Snake <br />River near Lily are located near the confluence of these rivers. Therefore, <br />the respective records are indicative of the sediment and water yields of the <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />