My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7049
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7049
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7049
Author
Andrews, E. D.
Title
Present and Potential Sediment Yields In THe Yampa River Basin, Colorado and Wyoming.
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'./' <br /> <br /> <br />1".>-, <br /> <br />that shales are more comrron in the Crct2cec~s units and mudstones are ~ore <br />comr7',on in the Tertiary units. The Tert;ar~.; and Cretaceous sedimentary rocks <br />1 ie in a broad syncl inal basin, the axis of "hich strikes northvlest. <br /> <br />In the extreme western part of the ja~in. Paleozoic sedimentary rocks, <br />prinari 1'1' 1 ime~tone, sandstone, and siltstcne, are exposed on the land <br />surface. These rocks a:-e \'./ell induratec a,d are relatively resistant to ero- <br />s ion com par e d tot he v 0 u n 9 e r sed i men t s . P ~ e c am b ria n g n e i s San d s chi 5, t 0 u t _ <br />crop along the eastern fringe of the \'a~D2 R:ver basin (fig. 6).,_These r'xks <br />also are relatively resistant to erosicn GO~.Jc.red,-'to the Terda.:Vy~ and Creta- <br />ceous sedjmentar~ rocks. <br /> <br />The interbedded 5c.na~tones, mudsts:nes, and -sllales shovln in figure 6 and <br />described above are relat:.lv,ely eroaible. Thev crop out vJidely throughcut the <br />basin, in~".ce,a-s of both relatively large and small sediment yield. <br />Therefore, the observed distribution of sedirent yields cannot be entirely <br />due to ~imil~rities or differences in the bedrock geology. <br /> <br />Mean-Ahnual Precipitation <br /> <br />In many areas, sediment yields are c16sely correlated with mean-annual <br />precipitation. Although mean-annual preci~itation alone is but one of the <br />important factors controll ing sedi~ent yields, many of the other factors, <br />such as vegetation, soil-type and clirate, are related to precipitation. <br />Langbein and Schumm (1958) developed a ceneral relation between sedi~ent <br />"yield and mean-annual precipitation (fig. 7). The most significant feature <br />\ of this relation for the present discussion fs that maximum sediment yields <br />\ may be expected from vlatersheds vlith a Mean-annual precipitation of about <br />\,12 inches (305 mm) per year. The peak in the sediment-yield curve at an <br />L-intermediate level of precipitation is partly explained by the generalized <br />vegetation profi Ie shown at the top of the graph (fig. 7). With increases <br />in mean-annual precipitation, the vegetative cover becomes progressively <br />thicker and more diverse. As a result, the potenti~l erodibi 1 ity decreases <br />bec2use the soil is protected from inte:Jsc:: rainfall, the soil particles are <br />bound together more firmly, and the soil profile is generally more permeable. <br />Thus, the decrease in sediment yield for a ~atershed which receives greater <br />than 12 inches (305 mm) of mean-an:Jual r;-ecipitation is prii:lar-ily due to <br />increased vegetative cover and developme~t of a soil profi le. <br /> <br />If mean-dnnual precipitation is less t':an 12 inches (305 mm), sedir;-ent <br />yields are 1 imited by the avai lable runoff. Thus, although potential <br />erodibil ity probably increases contin~aj ly as precipitation decreases, the <br />runoff is insufficient to transport the avai lable supply of sediment. <br /> <br />The areal distribution of mean-annual precipitation in the Yampa River <br />basin is shown on figure 8. The 12-inch (305-nm) per year 1 ine is of 8arti- <br />cular interest, because the greatest sediment yields might be expected from <br />areas near this J ine. About 40 percent of the Yampa River basin receives <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.