Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />,>",,'.;,1 <br />. ,.- ~ '-~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />f-/=.::hannel VJidth, in feet; <br />Dgo=grain size of bed material at the 9C~h ~e~centile fraction, <br />in millimeters; <br />u=mean velocity, in feet per second: <br />S=slope of the water surface; and <br />D =effect!ve grain size, in IT!ill;meter~, <br />m <br /> <br />The velocity, depth, and ,.:idtb offlm" fora c;i'ien discharge .."i,ere selected <br />from discharge meaSUrei'lents made at the ga;i.rg st2tions.The bed-rilaterial <br />size pa:-ameters \"ere conputed'from sieve-'"'ai:ah'sis of a composite bed-material <br />sample collec~.....-pt eachC~gaging station. The vJater-.surface slope '.';as <br />measured over a reach of channel, at least 20 channel v,idths in length and <br />including, the'gaging-station cross sectior, He mean bedload-transport-rate <br />versus water-discharge relation was determine~ ~y visual fit of the approxi- <br />mately 10 computed points. <br /> <br />The total-sediment-discharge versus wate~-~ischarge relation, shown by a <br />dashed 1 ine in figure 2, was determined b~ summing the suspended- and <br />bedload-sediment relations. I,./ith the rea-. relation bet\r-Jeen daily total- <br />sediment load and daily water discharge e3tabl ished, the average-~nnual <br />sediment load at the gaging stations ray be calculated from the average- <br />a~nual frequency of daily mean water discharges (Hiller, 1951). <br /> <br />Discharge-Duration ~e;ations <br /> <br />The cumulative frequency of dai ly mear d;scnarges observed at a gagj~~ <br />station may be represented by a flow-turation curve (fig. 3). The flow- <br />duration curve shows the percentage of time a s:ecific discharge was equaled <br />or exceeded in the per i od of record used. ',,'hen severa 1 yea rs of record are <br />used, the flow-duration curve describes the 2!erage or probable frequency of <br />various ranges of water discharges during 2 year. <br /> <br />The gaging stations in the Yampa RiVEr ~a~in have been operated at ~if- <br />ferent times and durations since October l?J~ (:able 1). Therefore, the dai- <br />ly water-discharge records are not concurrent 2nd cannot be compared direct- <br />ly. In order to obtain an estimate of the p:Jssible variations in the flO\'i- <br />duration curves due to variable times arj ~eciods of record, flow-duration <br />curves for the Yampa River at Steamboat S:ri~g5 we:-e computed for differert <br />periods of record. A comparison of the flcw-ju~ation curves based on several <br />sub records with the flow-duration curves bcse= en ~he entire recorc indicates <br />variations of less than 5 percent. BecaUSE ::h's value is less than tr.e <br />errors in the total-sediment-load versus di3c~arge relation, no attempt was <br />made to synthesize daily water discharges for a standard period of record at <br />all gaging stations. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />