Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" . <br /> <br />v"~.' -, ~ <br /> <br />, f.~ <br /> <br />ot;-ers, 13(5). Other sLispended-sedi;ent :-:'e2s:..:re:erts '..:ere made perrodi:al1y <br />fc- t~~ Ya:pa River near May~el I and Little Sna<e River near Lily as Dart o~ <br />the Nar: :onal 5tream Qual it)' Assessment Neti..:Jrk (';ASQ!-.tl) program (Fic;"e ane <br />Ha".~ins:Jn, 1975). +-he frequency of data collection at these stations has <br />change~ during the 1976 water year to a dally frequel1cy for the Yampa ~iver <br />near ~ay:el I and to a weekly frequency for the Little Snake River near Lily. <br />Also, ~aily or monthly sedlment measurerents are nade at several gaging <br />statlors in the Yampa River subbasin as part of ongoing cooperative prcgra~s <br />(" S ,,1 . I S 1076' <br />li. . -.:2010glca urvey, j J. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I~ethod of Corputar:ien <br /> <br />-.,,,,,", - <br /> <br />Estimates of me.on-annual sediment 10&ds for the 17 selected gaging <br />statior.s in theYamp.a River basin (flg.1),':ere computed using the.-rIO\,,- <br />duration, sediment'::transport::curve method cesccibed .by Mi 11er" (1951). This <br />method is useful when the 929)ng-stafiori""recol-d of streamflows is sufficient <br />to def i ne the...L.r.e'ftrency of occurrence of var i ous discharges, and vihen <br />sedi;;)er,t data, are 1 imited. A sediment-transport curve relating the dai ly <br />suspen~ed-sediment load and dai 1y water discharge was developed for each of <br />the 17 statio~s based upon the available measurements. Similarly, a relatio~ <br />between the computed bedload-transport rates and discharges was developed as <br />described subsequently. A total-'sediment-tra::sport curve was determined by <br />su~ming the suspended-load and ~edload relations. Then, the total-sediment- <br />load relation was combined with the average-annual frequency of occurrence of <br />various discharges recorded at each gaging station to obtain the mean-annual <br />total-sediment load at that location. <br /> <br />Total-Sediment-Load versus Discharge Relations <br /> <br />An example of how the total-sediment-discharge versus water-discharge <br />relations were constructed for each of the gaging stations is illustrated in <br />figure 2. As noted previously, the total-sediment discharge was composed or <br />two pa~ts, the suspended load which waS measured and the bedload which was <br />computed. Initially, sediment-transport curves relating the measured <br />suspenjed load and the computed bedload to the water discharge were dev~lcped <br />separately. The suspended-sediment-discharge versus water-discharge relation <br />was determined by plotting daily mean suspended loads against the daily mean <br />discharges. A mean relation, shown by a dashed I ine in figure 2, was calcu- <br />lated by a least-squares linear-regression f~nction of the log-transformed <br />da ta. <br /> <br />lne bedload-transport-rate <br />p~ted by the Meyer-Peter and <br />bedload-transport rate (I,), is <br /> <br />versus '.'Iater-discharge relations \,:ere co/- <br />Mueller (1948) equation. The total channel <br />given by: <br /> <br />.ib <br /> <br />( 1 ~ <br />= 2. 52D%O v.."':: <br /> <br />5'~ <br /> <br />, .., <br /> <br />O.86DJ!i[.7 <br />r;!. " <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />