Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ird_t <br /> <br />23% were over S5 cm at Duffy (Figures A2. Sa, S2, S3, and 54). In contrast catfish under 30 <br /> <br />cm were common on the Colorado River (Figure A2.55) and only 5% were over S5 cm. <br /> <br />Length frequency histograms for other species are included in Appendix C. <br /> <br />White sucker and small mouth bass were the only species in the Yampa River with a <br /> <br />large percent ofYOY or yearling sized fish inthe main channel. YOYbass were abundant at <br /> <br />Duffy but rare at the Sevens in both years (Figures A2.S9, 60, 61, and 62). By September <br /> <br />1999 the mean length ofYOY small mouth bass at Duffy was 65 mm which was higher than' <br /> <br />what was identified for fish from 1998 (60 mm) (Table 5). In Table 5, the fish from August <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />12 and 17, 1999 were collected by seining and the fish from later dates by boat electrofishing. <br /> <br />f'~ <br />r1 <br />I 1 <br />LcJ <br /> <br />Table 5: Mean length with sample size ofYOY small mouth bass for each sample date at <br /> <br />: 1 <br />!j <br />LJ <br /> <br />Duffi in 1998 and 1999. . . <br /> 1998 sample <br /> 3-Sep 15-Sep 22~$ep 30-Sep <br /> . 16-Sep 24-Sep <br />MM 60 64 70 70 <br />Sample size 47 60 228 31 <br /> 1999 sample <br /> 12-Aug 17-Aug 24-Aug 31-Aug 15-Sep <br /> 25-Aug 2-Sep 17-Sep <br />MM 38 47 53 65 66 . <br />Sample size 33 IS 91 23 35 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />DENSITY ESTIMATION <br /> <br />L:] <br />t,c.., <br />J <br /> <br />Fish density estimates were similar between years on the Yampa River at both sites. <br /> <br />The 1998 total fish density for the long Sevens reach was estimated to be 950/km :f: 78 (95% <br /> <br />'1 <br /> <br />1_-_- j <br /> <br />C.I.) not significantly different than the 1999 estimate of 1137/km:f: 182. This was in spite of <br /> <br />the fact the sampling stationwas'feduced in size by about half in 1999. The total fish estimate <br /> <br />~ --.:, <br /> <br />for the long Duffy station (Representative Reach) in 1998 was 4111km :f: 40 which was not <br /> <br />I , <br />'. .j.' <br />[1 <br />U <br /> <br />significantly different from the 1999 estimate of 409/km :f: 29. The fish sampling site was <br /> <br />F1 <br />_\ ] <br />j.-:, <br />t..,,~, <br /> <br />about the same total length in both years, but shifted upstream by about 0.7S lan. <br /> <br />3S <br />