My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9532
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9532
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:27:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9532
Author
Anderson, R. and G. Stewart.
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,_ 1 <br /> <br />In the IS-Mile reach study site fish were marked to designate the upper, middle and <br /> <br />lower sections of the site. Also the mark on the IS-Mile Reach indicated on which side of the <br /> <br />f1 <br />r- ! <br />, , <br /> <br />river the fish was caught. Eight electrofishing passes were made in this study site. The dates <br /> <br />~l <br /> <br />and the flow (cfs) of the fish sampling were 9/28 (2,060), 9/29 (2,000),9/30 (1,990), 10/5 <br />(1,660), 10/6 (1,420), 10/8(1,740) and 10/12 (1,860). To determine if marked fish could be <br /> <br />recaptured upstream, a 4.8 km reach was sampled from RM 180.4 to RM 177.4 (upper <br /> <br />terminus of study site) on October 13 and 14. A 4.5 km section of river was electro-fished <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />immediately downstream of the study site (RM 174.9) to RM 172.1 on October 15 and 18. <br /> <br />n <br />. 1 <br />t,j <br /> <br />HABITAT MAPPING <br /> <br />r.1 <br />I' <br />, I <br />t' . <br /> <br />'!;. <br />The use of two-dimensional flow models requires intensive channel mapping so that <br /> <br />the modeled reach can be accurately represented. The collection of this data can be very time <br /> <br />" <br />Ii <br />u <br /> <br />consuming and may represent a large proportion of the project cost. There are several ways <br /> <br />topographic and flow data can be collected, and several different methods were used in this <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />study; <br /> <br />L j <br /> <br />Total Station <br /> <br />lil <br />kJ <br /> <br />In .1998, bathymetry was collected at two locations on the Yampa River using a Pentax <br /> <br />Ii <br />tJ <br /> <br />PTsm total station. A total station gives flexibility to the user and allows them to determine <br /> <br />which survey points are necessary to represent the topography and to only gather data at those <br /> <br />points. Total stations calculate positions using basic trigonometric relatiJnships. The total <br /> <br />L.....:..~j <br />tJ <br /> <br />station uses a laser beam to determine the distance to a survey prism and simultaneously <br /> <br />r-" <br />;' -1 <br />; -:-1 <br />[, <br /> <br />measures the horizontal and vertical angles to the prism. Machine accuracy is represented by <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.