Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> -.. -S.III.& -Tot.. __alii. 8 <br /> 140,000 <br /> 120,000 <br />- <br />G.l ; <br />G.l <br />LL 100,000 <br />0 I - ..1- . _ . ... .. .. <br />0 ' , . - . <br />0 .....;......-...--~_... I <br />.... 80,000 I <br />... <br />G.l <br />c.. <br />- 60,000 <br />N <br />< <br />t:: <br />- <br />l'CJ 40,000 <br />~ <br /><( <br /> 20,000 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 <br /> Modeled Flow {cfs} <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 8. Squawfish-foraging-habitat/Flow relationship (Strata 6 and 8). <br /> <br />The results ofWUNflow relationships for each cluster are given in Table 6. The <br /> <br />inflection points for gross area for the 13 clusters ranged from 40 to 150 cfs and the mean <br /> <br />was 87 cfs. The wetted area for these inflection point flows ranged from 118,000 to <br /> <br />217,000 square feet. The smaller area is a reflection ofa narrower channel, since stream <br /> <br />length is standardized. The mean of the inflection points for daytime habitat is 104 cfs <br /> <br />(Table 6). The area of daytime habitat was very poor in eight clusters (less than 9% <br /> <br />gross), moderate at three (10-19% of gross) and daytime habitat was common at only <br /> <br />three clusters (more than 20%). Colorado squawfish nighttime WUA was more common <br /> <br />and uniform between clusters. The mean of the inflection points for nighttime WUA was <br /> <br />85 cfs (Table 6). <br /> <br />The mean of the inflection points (90, 104, 85 cfs) for gross, daytime and <br /> <br />nighttime habitat (Table 6) was similar to the inflection point found after the data was <br /> <br />averaged (80, 100 and 100 cfs, respectively). The advantage of identifying the inflection <br /> <br />27 <br />