Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 4-B. The mean and standard deviation of the inflection point flows (cfs) and <br />the inflection point flow for the 50, 70, 80 and 90 percentile runs for seven variables <br />at 40 runs. <br /> <br />Variable Mean Std. Dv. 50% 70% 80% 90% <br />Wetted Width (ft) 86.5 53.7 60 100 125 150 <br />Average Depth (ft) 86.3 45.9 80 100 120 125 <br />Change in Stage (ft) 84.0 24.4 80 80 80 100 <br />WidthlDepth Ratio 76.1 53.7 60 100 125 150 <br />Wetted Area (sq ft) 90.0 25.8 80 100 100 125 <br />Average Velocity (ftls) 91.8 36.0 100 100 100 125 <br />Grand Mean 85.8 41.6 <br /> <br />There were a total of 13 pools with cross sections, of which eight were in Strata 6 <br /> <br />and five in Strata 8. The grand mean for inflection points on pools was 89 cfs. For most <br /> <br />variables the mean of inflection points for pools were generally somewhat less than for <br /> <br />rimes and runs. The main exception was for velocity, which was 127 cfs (Table 4-C) and <br /> <br />the higher flow for velocity caused the grand mean for pools to be higher than runs. The <br /> <br />higher inflection points for velocity is explained by the fact that velocity is very low in <br /> <br />pools and therefore, the curve for the velocity/flow relationship does not have a dramatic <br /> <br />rate break as flows decrease to zero. <br /> <br />Flows of80 cfs would achieve inflection points on 50% of the pools measured <br /> <br />and 110 cfs would maintain 80% of the pools. Flows that equal or exceed the mean of <br /> <br />inflection points for rimes and runs, will also encompass those identified for pools. <br /> <br />19 <br />