Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Bank slopes and water surface elevations were measured using a standard surveying <br /> <br />level. Depth and velocity measurements were taken at 25 to 30 points along the profile. <br /> <br />The first cross section was placed at the most suitable hydraulic control point in the <br /> <br />cluster. Cross sections upstream of the control were positioned in the lower, middle and <br /> <br />upper parts of the run, and through a pool, ifpresent. Also in each cluster at least one <br /> <br />cross-section was positioned across the shallowest part of the riffle upstream of the <br /> <br />hydraulic control. Because of extraordinarily high base flows in 1997, priority was <br /> <br />assigned to sampling riffles, and because of that in some clusters only the riffles were <br /> <br />surveyed. Between one and three cross sections were done in the clusters where only <br /> <br />riffles were sampled. <br /> <br />HYDRA ULIC SIMULATION <br /> <br />The hydraulic equation was used to simulate flows from a range of 1 to 500 cfs. <br /> <br /> <br />The conveyance channel module ofRHABSIM (payne 1995) was used to model stage- <br /> <br /> <br />discharge relationships for cross sections on riffles. When multiple cross sections were <br /> <br />taken to determine habitat in a cluster, the step-backwater option was used. <br /> <br />This study was designed to determine habitat availability during the base flow <br /> <br />period, when flow typically ranges from 100 to 300 cfs. The plan was to do cross section <br /> <br />work at flows in this range because a single measurement could be accurately <br /> <br />extrapolated down to near zero. However base flows were high in 1997 and cross <br /> <br />sections were made at flows as high as 600 cfs. Concerns about only one stage-discharge <br /> <br />measurement were addressed by increasing the manning n at low flow since roughness <br /> <br />increases as flow decreases. Increasing mannings n at flows of 40% and less of the <br /> <br />measured flow did not change results compared to using the original mannings value. <br /> <br />11 <br />