Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1;ro) <br /> <br />!lID <br /> <br />lJ(\ <br />.1 I <br />~. " <br />;: ~~~\' <br />It r <br />~l~ ~~ <br />r <br /> <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />1axD <br /> <br />o <br />10'1 10'22 1V12 1:;13 1:<r24 V14 2'4 '2!ZJ 3'18 418 4r.B 5'J) 6'10 7/1 7/22 8'12 9'2 9'23 <br /> <br /> <br />am <br /> <br />-1CYfo <br />. . . J:P/o <br /> <br />-Wfo <br /> <br />-a::Pfo <br /> <br />- . !Ufo <br /> <br />.mJ <br /> <br />;ro) <br /> <br />Figure 2. .Annual hydrograph for the Yampa River, Maybell gage for 10%, 20%, <br />50%, 80% and 90% exceedence flows <br /> <br />FLOWS DURING THE STUDY PERIOD <br /> <br />Flows during the study period in 1996 (August to November) ranged between the <br /> <br />50% to 80% exceedence hydrographs (Figure 3). In 1996 flow was under 100 cfs for <br /> <br />two days. The minimum flow of79 cfs was on September 6, and the next lowest daily <br /> <br />mean flow was 88 cfs on September 5. Flow was under 128 cfs (50% exceedence <br /> <br />minimum) for 12 days. <br /> <br />7 <br />