My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7877
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7877
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:27:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7877
Author
Anderson, R. M.
Title
An Evaluation of Fish Community Structure and Habitat Potential for Colorado Squawfish and Razorback Sucker in the Unoccupied Reach (Palisade to Rifle) of the Colorado River, 1993-1995.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
FA Proj. SE-3,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The upstream extent of the historic range of Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) and <br />razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) in themainstem Colorado River was probably about 6000 ft <br />elevation, which is near the town of Glenwood Springs, Colorado (Maddux et al. 1993). Both the <br />Colorado Squawfish Recovery Plan (USFWS 1990) and critical habitat designation (USFWS 1994b) <br />use Rifle, Colorado, as the upstream boundary for recovery efforts. The Recovery Implementation <br />Program Recovery Action Plan (RIPRAP) specifically identifies repopulating the Colorado River <br />upstream of Palisade with Colorado squawfish and razorback suckers as an important action in <br />recovery of these endangered fishes (US Fish and Wildlife 1994a). <br /> <br />The decline in number of Colorado squawfish and razorback suckers in the Colorado River <br />drainage is often attributed to curtailed reproduction associated with manmade alterations to the <br />ecosystem (Holden and Stalnaker 1975; Seethaler 1978; Wydoski and Wick 1994). Razorback <br />suckers were known to occur in the IS-mile reach and above the HigWine Dam in the 1970's and <br />1980's, but have declined to extremely low numbers in recent years (Valdez et al. 1982; Bestgen <br />1990; Osmundson and Keading 1991; Maddux et al. 1993). Colorado squawfish have not been <br />collected in the Colorado River above the Highline Dam during recent biological studies (Chuck <br />McAda, pers comm. unpublished data; Valdez et al. 1982). The loss or disappearance of historic <br />Colorado squawfish populations above Palisade is primarily attributed to in stream diversion dams, <br />particularly the Price-Stub and Government HigWine dams, and fish passage structures at these <br />diversion dams could benefit recovery of Colorado squawfish and razorback suckers by providing <br />access to more than 50 miles of river now unoccupied (D. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994). <br /> <br />This study was established with the intent of formulating a management plan for Colorado <br />squawfish and razorback suckers for this unoccupied reach. This management plan addresses <br />in stream flow needs, aspects of nonnative fish control, and a stocking proposal for Colorado <br />squawfish and razorback suckers. Existing fish population and habitat characteristics of the reach are <br />presented and are used to make inferences about this area's potential for Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback suckers in regard to habitat availability, instream flows, forage, and habitat overlap with <br />nonnative species. <br /> <br />The specific study objectives are: <br /> <br />Objective 1: <br /> <br />To assess habitat availability for all life stages of Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback suckers in historic, but unoccupied range above Palisade, Colorado. <br /> <br />Objective 2: <br /> <br />To assess in stream flow needs, control of non-native fish impacts, feasibility <br />and risks of genetic stock management using hatchery-raised fish or natural <br />recolonization, and monitoring needs associated with reintroduction and <br />augmentation of these endangered fish in the upper mainstem Colorado River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.