Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The upstream extent of the historic range of Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius) and <br />razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) in themainstem Colorado River was probably about 6000 ft <br />elevation, which is near the town of Glenwood Springs, Colorado (Maddux et al. 1993). Both the <br />Colorado Squawfish Recovery Plan (USFWS 1990) and critical habitat designation (USFWS 1994b) <br />use Rifle, Colorado, as the upstream boundary for recovery efforts. The Recovery Implementation <br />Program Recovery Action Plan (RIPRAP) specifically identifies repopulating the Colorado River <br />upstream of Palisade with Colorado squawfish and razorback suckers as an important action in <br />recovery of these endangered fishes (US Fish and Wildlife 1994a). <br /> <br />The decline in number of Colorado squawfish and razorback suckers in the Colorado River <br />drainage is often attributed to curtailed reproduction associated with manmade alterations to the <br />ecosystem (Holden and Stalnaker 1975; Seethaler 1978; Wydoski and Wick 1994). Razorback <br />suckers were known to occur in the IS-mile reach and above the HigWine Dam in the 1970's and <br />1980's, but have declined to extremely low numbers in recent years (Valdez et al. 1982; Bestgen <br />1990; Osmundson and Keading 1991; Maddux et al. 1993). Colorado squawfish have not been <br />collected in the Colorado River above the Highline Dam during recent biological studies (Chuck <br />McAda, pers comm. unpublished data; Valdez et al. 1982). The loss or disappearance of historic <br />Colorado squawfish populations above Palisade is primarily attributed to in stream diversion dams, <br />particularly the Price-Stub and Government HigWine dams, and fish passage structures at these <br />diversion dams could benefit recovery of Colorado squawfish and razorback suckers by providing <br />access to more than 50 miles of river now unoccupied (D. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1994). <br /> <br />This study was established with the intent of formulating a management plan for Colorado <br />squawfish and razorback suckers for this unoccupied reach. This management plan addresses <br />in stream flow needs, aspects of nonnative fish control, and a stocking proposal for Colorado <br />squawfish and razorback suckers. Existing fish population and habitat characteristics of the reach are <br />presented and are used to make inferences about this area's potential for Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback suckers in regard to habitat availability, instream flows, forage, and habitat overlap with <br />nonnative species. <br /> <br />The specific study objectives are: <br /> <br />Objective 1: <br /> <br />To assess habitat availability for all life stages of Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback suckers in historic, but unoccupied range above Palisade, Colorado. <br /> <br />Objective 2: <br /> <br />To assess in stream flow needs, control of non-native fish impacts, feasibility <br />and risks of genetic stock management using hatchery-raised fish or natural <br />recolonization, and monitoring needs associated with reintroduction and <br />augmentation of these endangered fish in the upper mainstem Colorado River. <br />