My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9396
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9396
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:26:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9396
Author
Andrews, E. D., M. B. Bain, K. S. Lubinski, W. L. Minckley, J. A. Stanford, E. Wohl and R. S. Wydoski.
Title
Highlights of a Peer review and Roundtable Discussion on the Relationship of Streamflow, Geomorphology, and Food Web Studies in Recovery of the Endangered Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin - Final Draft Report.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />scopes-of-work were not described in terms of statistically <br />sound experimental designs. This recommended expansion of the <br />methods or approach section will enable peer reviewers to <br />evaluate information presented relative to their scientific <br />discipline or expertise. <br /> <br />(6) References. A literature cited or references section should <br />contain the literature relevant to the proposed study. Proposed <br />studies should contain a summary of pertinent published and <br />"grey" literature to ensure that the proposed study will be <br />conducted using the most reliable methods available and also to <br />prevent redundancy among different studies. <br /> <br />B. Annual Reports. <br /> <br />Annual reports did not provide sufficient detail to evaluate whether <br />or not the objectives of the studies were accomplished. It is <br />recommended that a systems approach be applied in the preparation of <br />annual reports. including: <br /> <br />(1) Evaluation of the data collected during the past year. <br /> <br />(2) Comparison of new data with data that were previously collected. <br /> <br />(3) Summary of accomplishments during the past year. including an <br />evaluation of whether objectives were accomplished. <br /> <br />(4) Refinements in experimental design. if necessary. for ongoing <br />projects. <br /> <br />By applying an adaptive management approach (Walters 1986) in the <br />preparation of annual reports. refinements can be made to the <br />experimental designs that will allow the most effective use of <br />available resources (i.e.. people. funds. and equipment). <br />Summarization and integration of current results with results from <br />previous studies can be used for making effective decisions and <br />necessary refinements to ensure that the expected results are <br />achieved. <br /> <br />2. Summary of Available Information. A great deal of information from the <br />various studies that have been completed by the Program participants is <br />available on the Upper Colorado River Basin and the endangered fishes. <br />Summarizing the available information is prerequisite in making effective <br />decisions regarding the Upper Colorado River ecosystem. <br /> <br />Further analyses and synthesis of available information will aid in <br />identifying gaps in information that may be required for recovery of the <br />endangered Colorado River fishes. This should be completed routinely as <br />the results of completed studies are summarized and integrated. It is <br />recommended that more emphasis be placed on summarizing available <br />information rather than continuing many studies that appear to be <br />redundant in collecting more information on the biology of the endangered fishes. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.