My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7862
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7862
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:26:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7862
Author
Andrews, E. D., M. B. Bain, K. S. Lubinski, W. L. Minckley, J. A. Stanford, E. Wohl and R. S. Wydoski.
Title
Highlights Of A Peer Review And Roundtable Discussion On The Relationship Of Streamflow, Geomorphology, And Food Web Studies In Recovery Of The Endangered Fishes In The Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A roundtable discussion between the peer reviewers and principal investigators <br />was held on February 6-7, 1995 prior to the 1995 Annual Meeting of Upper <br />Colorado River Basin Researchers in Grand Junction, Colorado. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />primarv Goal of Present Studies That were Reviewed. To develop <br />recommendations for reoperation of Flaming Gorge Dam and Aspinall Unit dams <br />for streamflows that would be adequate for recovery of the endangered fishes <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Ob;ectives of the Peer Review: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. Review selected streamflow, geomorphology, and food web projects. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2. Obtain consensus on whether present projects will provide the essential <br />information needed for developing scientifically sound streamflow <br />recommendations to benefit the endangered fishes. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3. Determine if the correct methods are being used to obtain essential <br />information. <br /> <br />4. Identify critical gaps in data being obtained with present studies. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />5. Provide recommendations on how to integrate data from streamflow, <br />geomorphology, and food web projects. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Deliverable. A written report summarizing highlights of the review of <br />Recovery Program documentation and the roundtable discussion between the Peer <br />Reviewers, Principal Investigators, Biology Committee members, and interested <br />parties. This report summarizes the highlights of the peer review as well as <br />provides recommendations for Recovery Program thrusts, improvements in <br />documentation, and protocol for future peer reviews. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Propagation and Nonnative Fish Program Coordinator, Dick Wydoski, served <br />as the recorder who prepared a draft summary of the review and roundtable <br />discussion. This draft report was reviewed by the peer reviewers and <br />appropriate modifications (i.e., additions, deletions, or revisions) were made <br />based on their comments. The final draft report was sent to the Biology <br />Committee on February 28, 1996 for their review. Comments that were received <br />were addressed, as appropriate, in this final report. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Although objectives 1 and 5 (identified in the INTRODUCTION section) were met, <br />a thorough review of the information related to the relationship of <br />streamflow, geomorphology, and the food web was not possible for two major <br />reasons: 1. The topic was too broad to discuss integration of these three <br />study areas within the available time. 2. The information contained in the <br />FY 1995 Scopes-of-Work and the FY 1994 Annual Reports was inadequate for the <br />peer reviewers to understand the relationship of the various studies to the <br />overall program. These two reasons are discussed more fully below. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.