My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8265
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8265
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:26:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8265
Author
Allendorf and e. al.
Title
RE
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Etter Pond Razorback Sucker Genetics Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. ~B lqq+ AI/end orfl ef- al. <br /> <br />1'J.t,c; <br /> <br />ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY <br />MEMORANDUM <br />CENTER FOR AQUA TIC ECOLOGY <br /> <br /> <br />..' . <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />RE: <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Mike Stempel <br />Genetics Panel (Allendorf, Echelle, Philipp, Williamson) <br />Etter Pond Razorback Sucker Genetics Report <br /> <br />February 25, 1994 <br /> <br />This memo should serve as the final review of the Genetics Panel on the Etter Pond <br />Razorback Sucker Report submitted by Dr. Don Buth. This review has been circulated and <br />edited by all members of the panel, representing consensus opinion. We believe that it would be <br />most useful and beneficial for this report to be circulated to Dr. Buth and other researchers <br />working on related projects (e.g., Drs. Dowling, Marsh, Douglas, Minckley, Morizot, Starnes) <br />for comment and discussion. We would be happy to answer any questions regarding what <br />follows. <br />As w.e reported at the Biology Committee Meeting in Salt Lake City (January 12- <br />14), we reviewed the report and do not agree with Dr. Buth's conclusion (p. 3 in bold) that "...the <br />entire Etter Pond population is introgressed with alleles from hybridization with flannelmouth <br />suckers." We disagree, therefore, with his recommendation that, "...all Etter Pond specimens, <br />and hatchery progeny, be destroyed to prevent the perpetuation and enhancement of genomic <br />pollution of the greater razorback population." Our arguments follow. <br /> <br />First, Dr. Buth's evidence for hybridization, suggested on page 3 as likely the result <br />of one or more F2 x F2 crosses, is based upon his classification of certain alleles (designated R <br />and F) as diagnostic for the two different species; i.e., that in "pure" populations, individuals are <br />fixed for their specific allele. This conclusion is based on a small survey of only a few <br />populations of flannelmouth and razorback suckers (Buth et. al., 1987). The three razorback <br />populations from which datil are presented (Lake Mohave, Senator Wash, and Dexter Hatchery) <br />most likely represent samples from a single gene pool from the lower basin. Recognition of <br />diagnostic alleles would require analyses of razorback suckers from populations in each of the <br />major drainages across the extant range of the species. In the 1987 paper, Buth et. al. report <br />fixed differences at only two loci, s-Sod-A2 and G6pi-A2; unfortunately, these loci were not <br />analyzed during the Etter Pond study. Two other loci analyzed in the 1987 study, CK-A and m- <br />Icdh-A, were used, however, neither of these loci showed fixed allelic differences between the <br />two species in the 1987 study. Buth et. al. (1987) attributed that allelic sharing to some level of <br />hybridization and implied that it represents a reasonably recent event. Two other loci, mMdh-A 1 <br />and Ada-A2, were also included in the current analysis and listed as fixed markers. Because no <br />data on the allele distributions at these two new loci across razorback and flannelmomh <br />populations were provided, evidence for fixation cannot be evaluated. _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.