Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.... I It <br /> <br />Confusing the issue, "however, is the potential effect of increased <br />discharge on survival of YOY Colorado squawfish. Warm backwater nursery <br />habitat was virtually nonexistent in the main channel of the downstream <br />Green River in 1983, due to the high flow. In 1982, increased discharge <br />in the Green River was associated with a lowered catch-per-effort of <br />Colorado squawfish YOY. It is possible that loss of optimum nursery <br />habitat was responsible for the poor survival of YOY Colorado squawfish <br />in 1983, or a combination of temperature and discharge. <br /> <br />The necessity for coupling optimum conditions on the Yampa River <br />spawning grounds with nursery areas in the downstream Green River for <br />the production of a good year class of YOY Colorado squawfish is becoming <br />evident, and these needs must be better understood. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The maintenance of Colorado squawfish spawning in the Yampa River <br />may be necessary if the Colorado squawfish in. the Green River Basin is <br />to be preserved in perpetuity. FWS and CDOW (Haynes and Muth 1984) data <br />show that recruitment in the upper Green River Basin is due to the <br />production of larvae from the Yampa River and, since the Yampa site <br />appears largest of the two main sites discovered in the Green River, the <br />Yampa River recruitment may be the factor driving the whole Green River <br />Colorado squawfish population. Major factors of concern addressed in <br />this report in protecting the Colorado squawfish include the provision <br />of optimum water quality and quantity for spawning, downstream transport <br />of larvae and rearing of the young in downstream nursery habitats. <br /> <br />Information provided by Rose (1984) and O'Brien (1984) indicate <br />sufficient flow can be provided for Colorado squawfish spawning habitats. <br />This information needs to be related to the need for year-round adult <br />habitat, stream passage (Tyus 1984) and downstream transport of larvae <br />in the Yampa River. It is just as important, however, to provide suitable <br />conditions in the Green River below the mouth of the Yampa, since there <br />is an interdependence between the Green and its free-flowing tributary. <br />In this respect, Flaming Gorge Dam is a dominating influence and flow <br />releases from the dam must also be related to the needs of the fish <br />within the system. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br /> <br />This study was funded in part by the Fish and Wildlife Service and <br />Bureau of Reclamation. The National Park Service and states of Colorado <br />and Utah aided in providing logistical support. Thanks are given to the <br />many State and Federal employees that supported this study in the field, <br />and special recognition is given to J. J. Krakker who shared supervision <br />of the field team. <br /> <br />32 <br />