Laserfiche WebLink
Habitat vs Discharge Study <br />As in 1982, high water limited our capability to complete all phases of <br />the work scheduled for this year. The absence of young Colorado squawfish <br />in the system prohibited the completion of the biological part of the <br />program. However, three study sites were chosen to evaluate physical <br />habitat changes from 22 Oct. to 4 Nov. as the discharge from Flaming <br />Gorge Reservoir was manipulated. Each site was selected to represent a <br />variety of riverine habitats between Split Mountain and Desolation <br />Canyons. The Locations were RK 504 (RM 315) in Dinosaur National Monument <br />(DNM), RK 465 (RM 291) just below the new Bonanza highway bridge, and RK <br />400 (RM 250) about two miles above the Ou ray br idge. The site at RK 504 <br />' consisted of a well defined rocky side channel at high flows and a <br />backwater and isolated pool in low flows. The site at RK 465 was a wide <br />shallow sandy area with numerous sand bars and small backwaters at both <br />high and low flow. The site at RK 400 consisted of a high runoff side <br />channel, a permanent island and a large eddy which developed into a <br />heavily-silted backwater at lower flows. <br />Water discharge from Flaming Gorge Dam was regulated to provide a Low <br />flow of 800 cfs and a high flow of 4,000 cfs. These flows represented <br />the lowest and highest flows anticipated during the September-October <br />period under study. Low flow was released at 0800 h on 22 October and <br />maintained until 0800 h on 24 October when the high flow was provided. <br />This sequence was repeated on 29 October to 31 October and the normal <br />release schedule was resumed at 0800 on 2 November. <br />Staff gauges were set at each site and the water levels were checked <br />every six hours from 23 October through 4 November. Depth measurements <br />were taken across the main channels at both 800 and 4000 cfs. During <br />the second rotation at both high and low flows, the site boundaries wer e <br />staked with white bags so they would be visible from the air. A photo- <br />grapher from the Bureau of Reclamation (BR) took aerial oblique photo- <br />g raphs at each site on 31 October and 3 November to record approximate <br />changes in selected habitats at high and low flows. <br />The change in the habitats of the selected sites with different flows <br />was similar between rotations at the DNM and Ouray sites. The site at <br />the Bonanza bridge, however, was markedly different due to scouring of <br />the shallow sandy area at high flows. At lower flows, the side channel <br />at the DNM site was dewatered and a backwater and small. isolated pool <br />formed on its downstream end. At higher flows, the side channel was <br />well established and the isolated pool became a backwater. The habitat <br />at the Bonanza bridge site was dominated by a sand bar along the left <br />bank just below the bridge with the main channel along its right bank. <br />At high flows, the sand bar formed an island with a shallow, sandy side <br />channel along its Left bank. At low flows the side channel closed off, <br />forming backwaters at both the upper and lower ends. The right side of <br />the island formed two backwaters. The Ouray site consisted of an <br />island in the main channel and a large shoreline eddy along the bend of <br />27: <br />