Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Humpback chub life-cycle partitions were difficult to define because <br />fish less than 200 mm TL cannot be differentiated from. the roundtail <br />chub. As a result, nearly all criteria for humpback chub have been <br />extrapolated from. observations of the adult size group and are predicated <br />upon the assumption that all life-stages inhabit the same general vicinity. <br /> <br />Until 1984 razorback sucker collections were primarily incidental to <br />activi ties directed toward the other two species of more prominent <br />concern because of their endangered species status. In 1984 a pilot <br />project was carried out to locate and study razorback spawning activity <br />in the upper Green River. <br /> <br />Sensitive Reach Criteria <br /> <br />The designation of tmportant river reaches for different phases of a <br />fishes life-cycle assumes that certain river reaches offer unique <br />physical conditions conducive to the cCJllpletion of that phase or pre- <br />ferred by individuals in that phase. Also, since m.uch of the infor- <br />mation we have on these fishes is capture data, many of the conclusions <br />relative to important reaches or preferred habitats assume that fish <br />abundance is due to habitat preference or the presence of necessary <br />habitat constituents. Therefore, in establishing criteria that defined <br />important reaches, catch statistics were most often utilized which <br />differentiated reaches by a higher catch rate than the rest of the river <br />system. An exception has been the designations derived from. direct <br />observations of fishes tracked by radio, primarily in the delineation of <br />spawning areas. <br /> <br />9 <br />