My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7055
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:24:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7055
Author
Archer, D. L., L. R. Kaeding and B. D. Burdick.
Title
A Study of the Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River.
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />COLORADO SQUAWFISH INVESTIGATIONS <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Colorado squa~fish, formerly the major piscavore of the Colorado River <br />basin, ~as historically distributed throughout the large rivers of the basin. <br />However, because of habitat modification, the introduction of exotic fishes <br />and other adverse changes in its environment, they no~ occur only in the upper <br />basin in Utah and Colorado--about 25' of its original range (Tyus et ,a1. <br />1982a, Tyus 1984). Although early ~hite settlers believed Colorado squawfish <br />undertook spawning migrations, evidence that supports such speculation was not <br />collected until recently. Holden and Stalnaker (1975b) and Seethaler (1978) <br />reported that the numbers of adult Colorado squawfish in the lower Yampa River <br />increased during late summer, apparently because the fish moved from the Green <br />River into the Vampa to spawn. Spawning migrations of more than 100 mi were <br />subsequently reported in the Vampa and Green rivers, as was long-distance <br />movement of squawfish from the White River to spawning areas in the Green and <br />lower Vampa rivers (MH11er et a1. 1983). <br /> <br />Because demands for upper Colorado River basin water might further alter <br />the river ecosystem, concern has arisen that additional water development <br />might eliminate Colorado squawfish. Particular concern was expressed for the <br />loss of spa~ning areas and the attendant reduction in reproductive success. <br />For example, some potential developments include dams that might block the <br />migration of adult Colorado squawfish to spa~ning areas and thereby adversely <br />affect reprOduction, much like dams have affected anadromous salmon <br />(Onchorhvchus spp. and Salmo salar). Other developments might eliminate <br />spawning areas directly, perhaps because of adverse changes in temperature, <br />dewatering, or the enhancement of undesirable fishes. Accordingly, the <br />objectives of the present study were: (1) to describe the seasonal movement <br />patterns of adult. Colorado squa~fish in the upper Colorado River and the <br />relationships between such movement and the occurrence of spa~ning areas; and <br />(2) to estimate the annual reprOductive success of Colorado squawfish in the <br />upper Colorado River and identify the factors that affect reproductive <br />success. These objectives relate directly to objeclives 1, 2, 3 and 6, as <br />described on page 7 of this document. <br /> <br />Study Area <br /> <br />The study area consisted of the 2OD-mi reach of the Colorado River <br />between the upstream region of Lake Powell, Utah, and the City of Palisade, <br />Colorado (Figure 1). Locations along the river are identified on the basis of <br />river-mile distance upstream from the confluence with the Green (River Mile <br />[RMl 0) according to maps provided in Belknap and Belknap (1978). Locations <br />below the conf1uence--in Cataract Canyon and upper lake Powell--are identified <br />as river miles upstream from lee Ferry (e.g., Hite Marina, RM 168; confluence <br />with Green River, RM 216). <br /> <br />We divided the study area into four reaches; reaches 1 and 2 and reaches <br />3 and 4 are separated by areas of major rapids--westwater and Cataract canyons <br />(Figure 1). River reaches in these canyons are not easily accessable and <br />therefore were not routinely sampled as part of the present study. Reach 4, the <br />upper reach (RM 110-185), consisted of the moderate-gradient region in the Grand <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.