Laserfiche WebLink
Land Use <br />Land designated for use as rangeland or forest in <br />the study unit comprises the lazgest land use, account- <br />ing for about 85 percent of the study unit (fig. 8). Live- <br />stock (sheep and cattle) use large areas of rangeland for <br />foraging. Forest land that includes most of the moun- <br />tain and plateau azeas is used for some commercial <br />lumber production from lodgepole pine, Englemann <br />spruce, and Douglas fir. Forest land also provides wild- <br />life habitat and recreational opportunities. <br />Large parts of the study unit are set aside for <br />recreational use, including all or parts of 4 National <br />Park Service areas, 11 Forest Service wilderness areas, <br />11 State parks, numerous State Wildlife Management <br />azeas, and 17 ski areas. Tourism and recreational activ- <br />ities are a major industry in the study unit. <br />Mining is another important land use in the study <br />unit. Past and present mining activities have included <br />the extraction of metals (copper, gold, lead, molybde- <br />num, nickel, silver, vanadium, and zinc) and energy <br />fuels (coal, gas, oil, oil shale, and uranium). <br />Urban land is one of the smaller land uses in the <br />mostly rural Upper Colorado River Basin. A number <br />of urban areas aze associated with development activi- <br />ties resulting from the expansion of the ski industry <br />and, in the 1980's, from energy-development activities. <br />Historically, urban land use was associated with <br />agricultural activities. <br />Agriculture is the traditional land use in the study <br />unit in counties such as Delta, Garfield, Gunnison, <br />Mesa, and Montrose. Agricultural activities include <br />production of crops such as alfalfa, fruits, grains, hay, <br />and vegetables. Little crop production is possible with- <br />outirrigation because of the semiarid climate. Irrigated <br />lands are predominantly in river valleys orlow-altitude <br />regions where the water is supplied by an extensive <br />system of canals and ditches. <br />Water Management <br />Water management in the study unit is greatly <br />affected by the 1922 Colorado River Compact and the <br />1948 Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. The 1922 <br />Colorado River Compact divided the Colorado River <br />Basin into upper and lower basins at Lee Ferry, Ariz., <br />and apportioned the beneficial consumptive use. The <br />1948 Upper Colorado River Basin Compact appor- <br />tionedthe water of the upper basin to five States <br />(Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyo- <br />ming) having drainage areas that contribute to the flow <br />of the Colorado River. An annual total of 7.5 million <br />acre-feet of water was apportioned to the upper basin, <br />allocating 50,000 acre-ft annually to Arizona. The <br />remaining water is allocated to the upper basin as <br />.follows: Colorado, 51.75 percent; New Mexico, <br />11.25 percent; Utah, 23 percent; and Wyoming, <br />14 percent (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1993). <br />In the Colorado River Basin, management of <br />water quality has been greatly affected by three public <br />laws: the Federal Water Pollution Control Act <br />Amendments of 1972 (Public Law 92-500), required <br />the establishment of a criterion for dissolved-solids <br />concentrations; the Colorado River Basin Salinity Act <br />(Public Law 93-320), established in 1974, authorized <br />construction of4salinity-control projects and develop- <br />ment of an additional 12 projects; and the 1984 amend- <br />ment to Public Law 93-320 (PL98-589) gave authority <br />to the Bureau ofReclamation and the U.S. Department <br />of Agriculture to install salinity controls needed to <br />meet the criteria for dissolved-solids concentrations. <br />In the study unit, there are 9 major interbasin <br />water transfers exceeding 4,500 acre-ftlyr, 7 major <br />water diversions, 9 major reservoirs, and 10 major <br />municipal dischazges for major cities in the basin. <br />These structures aze shown in figure 9 and listed in <br />table 3. For water yeaz 1993, the nine major interbasin <br />water transfers conveyed about 585,000 acre-ft of <br />water from the Upper Colorado River Basin to the <br />South Platte, Rio Grande, and Arkansas River Basins. <br />These interbasin water transfers provide supplemen- <br />tary irrigation and municipal water supplies to the <br />receiving South Platte, Arkansas, and Rio Grande <br />drainages. About 25 percent of the interbasin water <br />transfers is for the municipal water supply for the <br />Denver metropolitan area. <br />Water Use <br />Most of the water used in the study unit comes <br />from surface-water sources; nevertheless, ground <br />water is an important resource in remote and rural areas <br />where the water predominantly is used for domestic <br />purposes. Estimated offstream water use from surface <br />water in the study unit during 1990 totaled about <br />3,500 MgaUd as listed in table 4. Ground-water <br />sources accounted for less than 1 percent of the water <br />used. The principal water use in the basin is for irriga- <br />tion, which accounts for about 97 percent of the off- <br />streamwater use (table 4). The remaining 3 percent is <br />accounted for by the following in order of decreasing <br />water use: livestock, domestic, power, industrial, com- <br />mercial, and mining. <br />Consumptive use, which includes water that has <br />evaporated, transpired, been incorporated into crops <br />or products, or consumed by humans or livestock, <br />14 Environmental Setting and Implications on Water duality, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado and Utah <br />