Laserfiche WebLink
<br />40 BIOLOGICAL REPORT 90(5) <br /> <br />Use of Multiple Methods for Instream Flow <br />Recommendations-A State Agency Approach <br /> <br />by <br /> <br />Steven E. Reed and James S. Mead <br /> <br />Division of Water Resources <br />Aquatic Ecology Branch <br />P.O. Box 27687 <br />Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 <br /> <br />North Carolina's waters range from the coldwater <br />trout streams of the Appalachian Mountains to the <br />meandering blackwater streams of the Coastal <br />Plain. In between lie the coolwater streams and <br />rivers of the Foothills and the Piedmont's broad, tur- <br />bid rivers. The State's instream flow issues are also <br />diverse. Many of these issues involve hydropower <br />projects-either the existing facilities or the plan- <br />ning and design of new ones-and include peak <br />power production, diversions of various lengths, and <br />run-of-river projects that illegally peak. There are <br />also concerns with existing reservoirs constructed <br />for purposes such as municipal and industrial water <br />supply, recreation, or irrigation. Many of these <br />projects are old, and most do not have a required <br />minimum flow. Direct withdrawals of water from <br />streams also affect instream flow and aquatic <br />habitat, including withdrawals for municipal and in- <br />dustrial water supply, irrigation, aquaculture, and <br />thermal power plant cooling water. <br />The Division of Water Resources has been in- <br />volved in instream flow studies since 1977. The divi- <br />sion has conducted over 50 wetted perimeter studies <br />and 24 Instream Flow Incremental Methodology <br />(IFIM) studies, and it has made numerous flow <br />recommendations using desktop methods. Every <br />available opportunity is taken in project evaluation <br />to address instream flow concerns. The State Dam <br />Safety Law is applicable to all non- Federal dams <br />higher than 15 feet that impound at least 10 acre- <br />feet of water. This law is used to stipulate minimum <br />flows from new dams unless they are located on <br />intermittent streams. Hydropower projects must <br />obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and <br />Necessity (CPCN) from the North Carolina Utilities <br />Commission before construction. If the hydropower <br />project will not be receiving a license or exemption <br />from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, <br />then the Division of Water Resources will attach its <br /> <br />instream flow recommendation to the Utilities Com- <br />mission certificate. Instream flow recommendations <br />may also ~e added as conditions to State 401 water <br />quality certification and Federal 404 permits for <br />projects that affect stream flow regimes. <br />Many factors are considered in selecting an in- <br />stream flow assessment method. First, the value of <br />the resource to be protected is considered. For ex- <br />ample, a prime redbreast sunfish stream is handled <br />differently than a severely degraded stream. The <br />magnitude and duration of the project's impact are <br />also evaluated by such factors as distance to the next <br />major tributary, length of the diversion, or number <br />of acres of potentially affected habitat. An attempt <br />is made to determine whether the project will <br />become controversial and what type of negotiations <br />might take place. Other concerns include the man- <br />power available for a study and how much time re- <br />mains before a decision must be made. <br />The instream flow methods used can be separated <br />into desktop and field methods. Desktop methods <br />are used for projects with small impact or when a <br />recommendation must be made quickly. A recon- <br />naissance visit is usually made, and a recommenda- <br />tion is developed using one of several desktop <br />methods. A previous recommendation may be <br />ratioed by drainage area to a new location if there <br />is an existing instream flow study site nearby and <br />if the initial field visit indicates that the projects are <br />similar. Review of hydrologic data may be used to <br />develop a recommendation. Stream flow data from <br />an appropriate U.S. Geological Survey gage are <br />analyzed for mean annual flow and 7Q10 (lowest <br />flow for 7 consecutive days, with a 10-year recur- <br />rence interval), as well as monthly means, medians, <br />and lowest daily flows of record. These data are used <br />to compare natural and proposed flow regimes. In <br />areas where aquatic habitat is deemed minimal or <br />nonexistent, the 7Q10 flow becomes the instream <br />