My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7405
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:23:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7405
Author
Bain, M. B., ed. 1990.
Title
Workshop Synopsis,
USFW Year
Ecolog
USFW - Doc Type
U.S. Department of the Interior,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />38 BIOLOGICAL REPORT 90(5) <br /> <br />Discharge versus Habitat in Steep-gradient Piedmont Streams <br /> <br />by <br /> <br />Jeffrey W. Foltz <br /> <br />Department of Aquaculture, Fisheries, and Wildlife <br />Clemson University <br />Clemson, South Carolina 29634 <br /> <br />The focus of previous, ongoing, and future stream <br />fish habitat research is the relation of the fish com- <br />munity to substrate composition, water depth, and <br />water velocity. My basic premise has been that a <br />diverse habitat will support a diverse fish community <br />if water quality is suitable. Mter many years we <br />have come to expect reductions in fish species diver- <br />sity following catastrophic changes to a stream's <br />habitat, such as channelization. Fishes of the Pied- <br />mont in the southeastern United States may be <br />divided into three broad categories of habitat users: <br />sculpins (Cottus spp.) and darters (Etheostoma spp. <br />and Percina spp.), which prefer swift waters of rif- <br />fles; minnows and suckers, which use open runs and <br />midstream pools; and sunfishes (Lepomis spp.) and <br />basses (Micropterus spp.), which seek cover near <br />undercut banks and jams. These three broad <br />categories of habitat are defined largely in terms of <br />water velocity and depth. Substrate diversity is also <br />important, not only because it provides a variety of <br />spawning habitat for fishes, but also because it is <br />the primary site of aquatic insect productivity. <br />The ratio of riffles to pools is thought to represent <br />a fundamental characteristic of a stream ecosystem. <br />A cross section or transect across a Piedmont <br />stream or river frequently produces a series or mix- <br />ture of small pools and riffles. Whereas a pool by <br />itself might serve as a feeding station for a <br />predatory fish, suitability of the pool depends on its <br />proximity to a riffle in order to provide drifting in- <br />sects. The original riffle-pool concept was theorized <br />as a longitudinal phenomenon; however, a balance <br />of riffles and pools at an acceptable level (e.g., at <br />a ratio equal to that at median flow) might very <br />well be necessary for maintenance of a diverse fish <br />community. <br />Longitudinal increases in fish species diversity are <br />well known. In my research, fish species diversity <br />was predictable from substrate diversity, and sub- <br />strate diversity increased downstream. Fish abun- <br />dance (Le., catch per unit effort) was positively <br /> <br />related to width, depth, and percent cobble (Le., <br />rubble) and negatively related to percent bedrock <br />and percent silt and sand in the substrate. Currently, <br />I am researching (1) the relation between discharge <br />and diversity of velocity-depth combinations, (2) the <br />relation between discharge and the riffle-pool ratio, <br />(3) how relations 1 and 2 are related to conventional <br />wetted perimeter-discharge curves, and (4) fish <br />community diversity in relation to velocity-depth <br />diversity and the riffle-pool ratio. Field methods <br />involve placing numerous transects in a study <br />section and measuring velocity, depth, and sub- <br />strate at 1-m intervals along each transect. Subse- <br />quently, each interval is categorized into 1 of <br />13 categories, which include dry, 3 riffle categories, <br />5 pool categories, and 4 categories of runs. <br />Velocity-depth diversity seems to gradually decline <br />with reductions in discharge, and it collapses near <br />the inflection point on wetted perimeter-discharge <br />curves. This reduction is primarily due to reduction <br />in the 4 categories of runs. The riffle-pool ratio <br />remains generally flat with reductions in discharge, <br />but collapses near the wetted perimeter-discharge <br />inflection point. <br /> <br />Information Sources <br /> <br />Deacon, J. E., and W. G. Bradley. 1972. Ecological <br />distribution of fishes of the Moapa River in Clark Co., <br />Nevada. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 101:408-419. <br />Fausch, K. D., C. L. Hawkes, and M. G. Parsons. 1988. <br />Models that predict standing crop of stream fish from <br />habitat variables: 1950-1985. U.S. For. Serv., Pac. <br />Northwest Res. Stn. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-213. <br />52pp. <br />Foltz, J. W. 1982. Fish species diversity and abundance <br />in relation to stream habitat characteristics. Proc. <br />Annu. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies <br />36:305-311. <br />Fraser, J. C. 1972. Regulated stream discharge for fish <br />and other aquatic resources-an annotated bibliography. <br />F AO Fish. Tech. Pap. 112. 103 pp. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.