Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rupestris) and longear sunfish (Lepomis megalotis). <br />I studied behavior of individual fish by underwater <br />observation and telemetry; documented population <br />characteristics of density, biomass, and condition; <br />and attempted to relate habitat use by individuals <br />to the well-being of the population. <br />I documented daytime habitat use in summer <br />using underwater observation. After I corrected for <br />differences in the amount of open water and each <br />cover type observed, over 90% of individuals of each <br />species were found to be positioned within 1 m of <br />cover. Overlaps in cover use between species sug- <br />gested that cover is not important in interspecific <br />segregation. Species segregation was strongest by <br />current velocity, with small mouth bass using cover <br />in the fastest water and longear sunfish using cover <br />in the slowest water. Current velocity was also im- <br />portant to smallmouth bass and longear sunfish as <br />an element of intraspecific segregation. Strong <br />positive linear relations between water depth and <br />fish size were noted for all three species, but water <br />depth was not important in interspecific segrega- <br />tion. Substrate use appeared to be dependent on <br />cover use, and results were inconclusive. All three <br />species shifted habitat throughout the day, but the <br />greatest shifts occurred at night. <br />Telemetry studies on small mouth bass substan- <br />tiated the observational studies and added informa- <br />tion on fish habitat associations in winter, when fish <br />used boulders almost exclusively. Both studies <br />showed that small mouth bass avoided shallow areas <br />and existed almost exclusively in current velocities <br /><0.2 m/s. I believe that the results of studies em- <br />phasizing individual fish can be used with other <br />studies to delineate essential habitat conditions for <br />smallmouth bass populations. <br />Regression models from population studies <br />showed that depth and current did not correlate with <br />standing crop of smallmouth bass. Perhaps these <br />variables are important but are available in greater <br />~ ~~ounts than needed. What the regression model <br />~ show is that boulders had a positive relation <br /> <br />~ - <br />'- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />CENTRARCHID-HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS 19 <br /> <br />to standing crops. Perhaps boulders are an essen- <br />tial habitat or a limiting factor for smallmouth bass <br />in these streams because of some important, yet <br />still unclear, function during cold-water periods. <br />Fish may be more energetically efficient when <br />associated with boulders during stressful periods. <br />The significant, positive, but weak relation between <br />boulders and fish density or biomass indicates that <br />fish use boulder areas in a nonlinear fashion. Under- <br />water observations indicated that a single boulder <br />properly situated could accommodate as many as <br />eight adult smallmouth bass. Thus, while a particular <br />aspect of the habitat may be essential, its quality <br />may be far more important than its quantity. These <br />studies suggest that obtaining the information <br />necessary for effective management of a fish popula- <br />tion requires several approaches, and all these ap- <br />proaches have to be repeated for different life <br />stages. <br /> <br />Information Sources <br /> <br />Covington, W. G., R. E. Marteney, and C. F. Rabeni. 1983. <br />Population characteristics of rock bass and smallmouth <br />bass in the Ozark National Scenic Riverways. Trans. Mo. <br />Acad. Sci. 17:27-35, <br />McClendon, D. D., and C. F. Rabeni. 1986. A comparison <br />of electrofishing and underwater observations in <br />evaluating population characteristics of stream centrar- <br />chids. Proc, Annu. Conf. Southeast. Assoc. Fish Wild!. <br />Agencies 40:92-10l. <br />Probst, W" C. F. Rabeni, C. G. Covington, and R. E. <br />Marteney. 1984, Resource partitioning between stream- <br />dwelling rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris) and small- <br />mouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui). Trans. Am. Fish. <br />Soc. 113:283-294. <br />Rabeni, C. F., D. D. McClendon, W. Probst, B. Todd, <br />A. Livingstone, and D. I. Foster. 1990. Management of <br />smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui) in the Ozark <br />National Scenic Riverways, Proceedings of the Con- <br />ference on Science in the National Parks, July 1986, <br />Fort Collins, Colo. In press. <br />Todd, B. L., and C. F. Rabeni. 1989. Movement and <br />habitat use by stream-dwelling smallmouth bass. Trans. <br />Am. Fish. Soc, 118:229-242. <br />