Laserfiche WebLink
<br />109. Broom, M.E., 1962, Sources of potable water supplies for the U.s. National Park Service <br />recreational area, Crawford Dam and Reservoir site, Delta, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey <br />Open-File Report, 9 p. <br /> <br />110. Brown, H.E., and Dunford, E.G., 1956, Streamflow in relation to extent of snow cover in central <br />Colorado: U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Paper 24, <br />9p. <br /> <br />111. Brown, H.E., and Thompson, J.R., 1965, Summer water use by aspen, spruce, and grassland in <br />western Colorado: Journal of Forestry, v. 63, p. 756-760. <br /> <br />112. Brown, T.C., Harding, B.L., and Payton, E.A, 1990, Marginal economic value of streamflow--A <br />case study for the Colorado River Basin: Water Resources Research, v. 26, no. 12, p. 2845-2859. <br /> <br />The marginal economic value of stream flow leaving forested areas in the Colorado <br />River Basin, USA, was estimated by determining the impact on water use of a small <br />change in stream flow and then applying economic value estimates to the water use <br />changes. The specific objective was to estimate the economic value of increases in <br />runoff that could be created by timber harvest in these areas. The effect on water use <br />of a change in stream flow was estimated with a network flow model that simulated <br />salinity levels and the routing of flow to consumptive uses, including agriculture, and <br />hydroelectric dams throughout the Basin. The results show that, under current water <br />management institutions, the marginal value of stream flow in the Colorado River <br />Basin is largely determined by non-consumptive water uses, principally energy <br />production, rather than by consumptive agricultural or municipal uses. The analysis <br />demonstrates the importance of a systems framework in estimating the marginal value <br />of stream flow. - <br /> <br />113. Bruce, C.A, 1933, History of Federal reclamation and its accomplishments on the Uncompahgre <br />Project, Colorado: Gunnison, Colo., Western State College, Master's thesis. <br /> <br />114. Bryant, Bruce, 1972, Map showing ground-water potential in the Aspen quadrangle, Pitkin <br />County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map 1-785-B, <br />scale 1:24,000. <br /> <br />115. Bryant, Bruce, 1972, Map showing relative permeability of rocks and surficial deposits of the <br />Aspen quadrangle, Pitkin County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous <br />Investigations Series Map 1-785-F, scale 1:24,000. <br /> <br />116. Buchberger, s.G., 1981, Flood frequency analysis for regulated rivers: Transportation Research <br />Record 832, p. 12-21. <br /> <br />117. Bullock, J.H., Jr., Barton, H.N., Briggs, P.H., and Roemer, T.A, 1989, Analytical results and <br />sample locality map of stream-sediment, heavy-mineral-concentrate, and rock samples from <br />the Gunnison Gorge Wilderness Study Area (CO-030-388), Delta and Montrose Counties, <br />Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 89-439, 11 p. <br /> <br />118. Bureau of Land Management, 1961, Selected oil shale bibliography, 1895-1961, inclusive: <br />Denver, Colo., Bureau of Land Management, 64 p. <br /> <br />26 Bibliography. Indices. and Data Sources of Water-Related Studies, Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado <br />and Utah. 1872-1995 <br />