Laserfiche WebLink
<br />69. Betzer, J.L., Swope, H.M., Remington, J.D., and Rutherford, W.H., 1956, Suitability of physical <br />factors for beaver management in the Colorado Rockies: Denver, Colo., Colorado Department <br />of Game and Fish Technical Bulletin 2, 32 p. <br /> <br />70. Bevans, H.E., 1989, Interior Province; western region, in Britton, L.J., Anderson, c.L., Goolsby, <br />D.A, and Van Haveren, B.P., eds., Summary of the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of <br />Land Management national coal-hydrology program, 1974-84: U.S. Geological Survey <br />Professional Paper 1464, p. 53-61. <br /> <br />71. Binder, C.W., Bargsten, G., Mancuso, B.F., Evans, RG., Walker, W.R, and Skogerboe, G.V., <br />1978, Grand Valley salinity control demonstration project--Basic field data: Fort Collins, Colo., <br />Colorado State University, 194 p. <br /> <br />72. Bishop, AB., 1977, Impact of energy development on Colorado River water quality: Natural <br />Resources Journal, v. 17, no. 4, p. 649-671. <br /> <br />73. Bishop, AB., 1978, Competition of energy development for water use in Upper Colorado River <br />Basin: Pittsburg, Pa., American Society of Civil Engineers National Spring Convention and <br />Continuing Education. <br /> <br />74. Bishop, AB., Klemetson, S.L., Torpy, M.F., and McKee, M., 1979, Energy development vs. water <br />quality in the Upper Colorado and Upper Missouri River Basins: Los Alamos, N. Mex., Los <br />Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 183 p. [Available from National Technical Information Service, <br />Springfield, VA 22161 as NTIS Report LA-7574-MS.] <br /> <br />This report examines the relationship between energy development and water quality <br />in Upper Colorado and Upper Missouri River basins. To provide a background for <br />problem assessment, the general physiographic, water resources, and water quality <br />setting is described for each of the basins. The locations and types of energy resources <br />and present and possible future developments are also identified relative to the water <br />resource systems. The water quality problems and impacts from energy developments <br />are discussed in terms of various pollutants generated by energy extraction and <br />processing activities and the pollution transport mechanisms and pathways by which <br />they can enter surface water and groundwater. Looking at the problem from another <br />perspective, the report discusses the implications for energy development of the water <br />quality aspects of legislation requirements and regulations. Many of the potential <br />water pollution problems associated with energy development will not be results of <br />directs discharges - for zero waste water discharge appears to be the standard for <br />tomorrow, but rather will occur through the transport of pollutants from other <br />processes and disposal activities. These processes and activities are less obvious <br />contributors to water pollution problems and are therefore less likely to be controlled <br />than waste water streams themselves. In response to water quality regulations and <br />their ultimate objective to eliminate discharge, existing and proposed conversion <br />plants are planning for total containment of waste water with no discharge to the <br />stream system. The consumptive use of all water withdrawn for energy processing as <br />a pollution control measure raises three important issues - each of which represents a <br />potential conflict between energy developers' compliance with the legislation and <br />western water law: (1) junior rights and water transfer; (2) the beneficial use question; <br />and (3) the reasonable use measure of certain water quality practices. <br /> <br />BIBLIOGRAPHY 21 <br /> <br />~ <br />