My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9463
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:19:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9463
Author
Badame, P. V. and J. M. Hudson.
Title
Reintroduction and Monitoring of Hatchery-reared Bonytail in the Colorado and Green Rivers; 1996-2001.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
03-13,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />each method and second, the "relative catch rate" (RCR) for each method. Relative catch rate is <br />the expected catch per unit effort for every 1,000 fish stocked or: <br /> <br />((C/E)/S)*CS <br /> <br />Where C is the catch for a given cohort, E is the effort expended on particular method, S is the <br />number of a given cohort stocked, and CS is a constant of 1000. The utility of this expression can <br />be seen when comparing CPUE for two cohorts with very unequal stocking levels, in addition the <br />values can be statistically compared for a given method. <br /> <br />For electrofishing, fyke/hoop netting, and trammel netting, conventional measure of catch rates <br />such as, number of fish caught per hour, were used for analysis. However, for seining, an <br />unconventional measure of catch rate, "number caught per habitat seined", was used for two <br />reasons. First, depletion seining with block nets and multiple seine samples with fish returned <br />after each haul were both used during several years of sampling. If the number captured per area <br />seined was used as a catch rate, depletion sampling would produce lower catch rates compared to <br />returning fish after each haul, as is done during ISMP sampling. The second reason is simply that <br />the area seined was not recorded during several sampling sessions, and a number ofbonytail <br />captures would have been excluded from analyses. We believe that reporting the number of <br />bonytail captured in each habitat seined provides the least biased assessment of seining returns. <br /> <br />Telemetry <br /> <br />In 1997, 10 bonytail from the 1996 cohort held overwinter at Wahweap (average TL 330.3 mm) <br />were implanted with radio transmitters at the hatchery and held for 10 days. Eight of these fish <br />were released into the Colorado River on October 18, 1997. The remaining two fish were <br />released two days later due to complications with the transmitters. Transmitters were configured <br />to the following specifications: 5 g, external antenna, 60 day battery life. The radio-tagged <br />bonytail were tracked daily for the first two weeks after release and then at least twice weekly. In <br />total, 36 days of general daily tracking occurred between October 21 and December 23, 1997. <br />Tracking was conducted from RM 110 to the confluence with the Green River. <br /> <br />On March 9, 1998, another 10 bonytail from the 1996 cohort (average TL 337.3 nun) were <br />implanted with radio transmitters at Wahweap (ATSII> Model 10-18; 80-day transmitter life), <br />returned to the growout pond for a week of recuperation, and then stocked into the Colorado <br />River on March 18, 1998. Bonytail were tracked daily for the first two weeks after release and <br />then at least twice weekly. In total, 36 days of general daily tracking occurred between March 18 <br />and August 6, 1998. Intensive 24-hour tracking sessions, in which hourly triangulations were <br />calculated, were added in 1998 following the previous years observation that bonytails appeared <br />photosensitive. During the intensive sessions, more than one bonytail was often tracked on a given <br />night if the fish were in close enough proximity. Eight intensive tracking efforts were conducted <br />between March 26 and August 6. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.