My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9463
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:19:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9463
Author
Badame, P. V. and J. M. Hudson.
Title
Reintroduction and Monitoring of Hatchery-reared Bonytail in the Colorado and Green Rivers; 1996-2001.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
03-13,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />within 40 RM below the release site, with the remaining 15% distributed fairly evenly down to <br />the confluence of the Colorado. The pattern was similar on the Colorado River where 94% of all <br />bonytail captures occurred within 30 RM downstream of the release site. Overall, it would <br />appear that juvenile bonytail are not entering the higher gradient canyon sections, which confine <br />the two flat-water sections in which they were released. This is further supported by ISMP <br />sampling and population estimates for humpback chub in Westwater (1997-2000), Cataract <br />(1998-1999), and Desolation/Gray (200 I) canyons, in which yielded no stocked bonytails. One <br />adult bonytail (TL 370 mm) was captured in Gray Canyon (RM 148) during the 2002 humpback <br />chub population estimate. <br /> <br />A total of 49 adult sized bonytail (TL >300 mm) were implanted with radio tags in the Colorado <br />and Green rivers during 1997-2000. The overall survival of radio-tagged bonytail was excellent <br />throughout the study. Only one of the 49 bonytail implanted was suspected to be deceased before <br />tag failure. Survival of the bonytail was confirmed via daily movements throughout the life of <br />the tags or until the fish had moved out of monitored areas. This was a vast improvement over <br />the confirmed mortality rate of 74.4 % experienced by Chart and Cranney (1993) during the <br />tracking of 86 bonytail in 1988 and 1989. The most important variable affecting survivorship of <br />radio-tagged fish was likely age at release. For bonytail tracked in the Colorado and Green rivers <br />specific habitat locations were recorded for 574 contacts. Many habitats were utilized throughout <br />the study period, however, we believe that after the period of acclimation adult bonytail were <br />selecting areas which offered a combination of eddy and run habitats. Each year bonytail showed <br />a basic pattern of being sedentary for the first month following release, then increasing in both <br />longitudinal and local activity during periods of spring runoff, and finally moving back upstream <br />to areas which offered eddy/run habitats. Although downstream movements up to 113 river <br />miles were observed radio-tagged fish generally remained within 20 river miles of their release <br />sites and all remained within the flat-water section in which they were released. <br /> <br />Final recommendations include the following: 1) stock hatchery-reared bonytail in the Colorado, <br />and Green, rivers at a target size of 300 mm, 2) mark all hatchery-reared bonytail with PIT tags <br />prior to release, 3) stock bonytail in March to early April to allow for an adequate acclimation <br />period. 4) monitor stocked bonytail in mid-April to early June, and utilize electrofishing as the <br />primary monitoring method. 5) monitor for successful bonytail reproduction, and 6) any further <br />investigation of flow training should occur at Wahweap State Fish Hatchery. <br /> <br />Keywords: bonytail, Gila elegans, stocking, reintroduction, monitoring, telemetry, Colorado <br />River, Green River <br /> <br />IX <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.