Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I. INTRODUCTION <br />During the last two decades, interjurisdictional issues have <br />become increasingly important in water allocation, planning and <br />management. Supplies of water have become tight. Environmental <br />concerns, often manifested in federal programs, have come to the <br />fore. Indian tribes have begun to adjudicate and exercise their <br />reserved rights. Ultimately, water development projects that <br />traditio~ally were resolved as a matter of one state's internal <br />law must now proceed in the context of obligations to other <br />jurisdictions -- the federal government, other states, Indian <br />tribes, and sometimes foreign governments. This presentation <br />treats the constitutional division of power among governments in <br />the field of water policy by examining federal power, state <br />authority, tribal prerogatives, arid the power of Congress and the <br />courts to allocate water among jurisdictions. <br /> <br />II. THE NATURE OF FEDERAL POWER <br />A. The Concept of Naviqabilitv for Title <br />1. Development of the Doctrine <br />Most nations in the world have given some kind of <br />special legal treatment to major watercourses <br />receiving substantial commercial and recreational <br />use. In the United States, the underlying <br />rationale of the navigability concept traces to <br />Roman and English law. Under Roman law, navigable <br />rivers were a class of watercourses that received <br />a higher degree of regulation and protection. In <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e) <br /> <br />.~ <br />