<br />Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource
<br />
<br />Monday, June 5,1989
<br />
<br />AM
<br />800
<br />8:30
<br />840
<br />
<br />LEGAL PRINCIPLES AND ISSUES
<br />
<br />Registration and Coffee
<br />
<br />Welcome
<br />
<br />Allocation of the Nation's Rivers: the Constitutional
<br />Framework
<br />Prof. Charles F. Wilkinson, University of Colorado School
<br />of Law
<br />The constitutional premises for allocating interstate and
<br />international watercourses have undergone considerable
<br />evolution and clarification in recent years. Topics will include
<br />the state ownership doctrine; navigability for title; state police
<br />power; federal regulatory power under the Commerce
<br />Clause; relationships among state, federal, tribal, and foreign
<br />governments; state and federal court jurisdiction; and
<br />interstate compacts and international treaties.
<br />
<br />Allocation of International Rivers: Recent
<br />Developments in International Law
<br />Prof. Daniel B. Magraw, University of Colorado School of Law
<br />Non-navigational use of international water courses is one of
<br />the most political issues facing many countries today. This
<br />talk will summarize eXisting international norms, describe the
<br />U.N. International Law Commission's work in developing
<br />and codifying law in this area, and discuss the Canadian-
<br />U.S. International Joint Commission's recent ruling on the
<br />Cabin Creek Coal Mine controversy.
<br />
<br />Break
<br />
<br />Interjurisdictional Water Quality Issues
<br />Prof. Michael C. Blumm, Lewis & Clark, Northwestern
<br />School of Law, Portland, Oregon
<br />Water quality concerns, including instream flows, can affect
<br />water allocation decisions from an interjurisdictional
<br />perspective. This talk focuses on intra-federal and federal-
<br />state relations under the Clean Water Act, the Endangered
<br />Species Act, and the Federal Power Act, as well as inter-
<br />state conflicts under the equitable apportionment doctrine,
<br />state/tribal relations under Indian treaty rights, and inter-
<br />national water quality issues.
<br />
<br />Interjurisdictional Groundwater Allocation, Emerging
<br />Principles and Policies
<br />Ann Berkley Rodgers, Attorney, Albuquerque
<br />Public awareness of groundwater as a resource distinct from
<br />a jurisdiction's land base is relatively new. Approaches to
<br />allocation at the international level and within the US. will be
<br />discussed, focusing on the pnnciples and pOlicies that guide
<br />decision-makers in allocating and regulating groundwater
<br />resources.
<br />
<br />Lunch
<br />Speaker
<br />
<br />940
<br />
<br />1010
<br />1020
<br />
<br />11 :00
<br />
<br />11 :45
<br />
<br />PM
<br />115
<br />
<br />BASIN STUDIES
<br />
<br />The Colorado River Compact: A Breeding Ground for
<br />International, National and Interstate Controversies
<br />John U. Carlson, Carlson, Hammond & Paddock, Denver
<br />This paper will describe the present and future controversies
<br />inherent in the law of the Colorado River. The super-
<br />imposing of international goals and national environmental
<br />policies upon a contract to share common supplies is pro-
<br />pelling those -dependent on the River towards a show-down.
<br />
<br />Managing the Upper Rio Grande: Old Institutions, New
<br />Players
<br />Steven J. Shupe; Shupe & Associates, Santa Fe,
<br />New Mexico
<br />The Upper Rio Grande Basin has been managed for irri-
<br />gation and flood control for much of this century under
<br />interstate compact and federal laws. These institutions,
<br />however, have been tested in recent years by a far more
<br />complex set of interests, including fisheries, recreation, river
<br />corridor protection, wildlife, Indian rights, water marketing,
<br />water quality concerns and others. This presentation looks at
<br />possible mechanisms for forming policy and resolving
<br />disputes about these issues.
<br />
<br />Break
<br />
<br />205
<br />
<br />255
<br />
<br />315 Interstate Allocation of the Platte River
<br />Prof. J. David Aiken, Dept. of Agriculture & Economics,
<br />University of Nebraska
<br />Early interstate disputes regarding allocation of Platte river
<br />water focused on irrigation uses. These conflicts resulted in a
<br />U.S. Supreme Court decree on the North Platte between
<br />Nebraska and Wyoming, and an interstate compact between
<br />Nebraska and Colorado on the South Platte. More recent
<br />conflicts have focused on environmental protection in the
<br />central Platte River in Nebraska.
<br />
<br />405 The Arkansas River Controversy
<br />David W. Robbins, Hill & Robbins, P.C., Denver
<br />In December 1985, Kansas filed a lawsuit against Colorado
<br />alleging material depletions of the Arkansas River in violation
<br />of the Arkansas River Compact. Colorado filed a counter-
<br />claim alleging various violations of the same compact by
<br />Kansas. This presentation will describe the issues involved in
<br />the lawsuit and the current status of the litigation.
<br />
<br />5:00 End of day
<br />
<br />6:00 Cookout on Flagstaff
<br />
<br />Tuesday, June 6, 1989
<br />
<br />AM BASIN STUDIES (con't)
<br />
<br />845 Coordinated Water Management in a Basin with Erratic
<br />Surface Supplies: the Law North and South of the
<br />Pecos
<br />Prof. Charles T. DuMars, University of New Mexico School
<br />of Law
<br />This paper will explore the hydrology of the Pecos River
<br />Basin, the Interstate Compact regulating that basin and the
<br />implications for state and national water planning strategies.
<br />
<br />9:35 The Delaware River Basin: Courts, Compacts
<br />& Commissions
<br />R. Timothy Weston, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Harrisburg,
<br />Pennsylvania
<br />Delaware River waters serve the four-state region of the
<br />northeast megalopolis. The 50-year experience of litigation
<br />and compact commission programs provide a paradigm of
<br />maturing interstate management of shared re;;ources. A
<br />former Commissioner reflects on the lessons offered for other
<br />basins and regions.
<br />
<br />1025 Break
<br />
<br />1045 The Missouri River: River of Promise or Peril?
<br />John E. Thorson, Doney & Thorson, Helena, Montana
<br />The Pick-Sloan Plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of
<br />1944, was the charter for natural resource development in
<br />the Missouri River Basin. The promise of that charter has not
<br />been fulfilled and recent controversies-most notably the
<br />ETS/ Pipeline Project litigation-have resulted. This
<br />presentation reviews the shortcomings of the Pick-Sloan Plan
<br />and describes recent efforts of the ten basin states, 27
<br />Indian tribes, and federal agencies to develop new water
<br />management approaches for the river.
<br />
<br />1135 Lunch (on your own)
<br />
<br />PM INTERJURISDICTIONAL TRANSFERS
<br />
<br />105 Unique Legal Issues Raised by Long Distance Water
<br />Transfer Proposals: ETSI, the Columbia River, NAWAPA
<br />Prof. Ralph W. Johnson, University of Washington School
<br />of Law, Seattle, Washington
<br />Out-of-state, out-of-basin water transfer proposals such as
<br />ETSI, the Columbia to the Southwest, and NAWAPA, raise
<br />unprecedented legal and policy issues, which the speaker
<br />will identify and analyze.
<br />
<br />1 :50 ETSI Pipeline: the Future of an Illusion
<br />William Janklow, former Governor of South Dakota, Sioux
<br />Falls, South Dakota
<br />With the ETSI Pipeline, South Dakota attempted to set its
<br />own economic agenda by selling Missouri River water for
<br />industrial purposes outside the Missouri River basin. This
<br />paper Will examine the history and aftermath of the ETSI
<br />venture which, In light of the squabbles over western water,
<br />was an invitation to disaster.
<br />
|