Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Boundaries and Water: Allocation and Use of a Shared Resource <br /> <br />Monday, June 5,1989 <br /> <br />AM <br />800 <br />8:30 <br />840 <br /> <br />LEGAL PRINCIPLES AND ISSUES <br /> <br />Registration and Coffee <br /> <br />Welcome <br /> <br />Allocation of the Nation's Rivers: the Constitutional <br />Framework <br />Prof. Charles F. Wilkinson, University of Colorado School <br />of Law <br />The constitutional premises for allocating interstate and <br />international watercourses have undergone considerable <br />evolution and clarification in recent years. Topics will include <br />the state ownership doctrine; navigability for title; state police <br />power; federal regulatory power under the Commerce <br />Clause; relationships among state, federal, tribal, and foreign <br />governments; state and federal court jurisdiction; and <br />interstate compacts and international treaties. <br /> <br />Allocation of International Rivers: Recent <br />Developments in International Law <br />Prof. Daniel B. Magraw, University of Colorado School of Law <br />Non-navigational use of international water courses is one of <br />the most political issues facing many countries today. This <br />talk will summarize eXisting international norms, describe the <br />U.N. International Law Commission's work in developing <br />and codifying law in this area, and discuss the Canadian- <br />U.S. International Joint Commission's recent ruling on the <br />Cabin Creek Coal Mine controversy. <br /> <br />Break <br /> <br />Interjurisdictional Water Quality Issues <br />Prof. Michael C. Blumm, Lewis & Clark, Northwestern <br />School of Law, Portland, Oregon <br />Water quality concerns, including instream flows, can affect <br />water allocation decisions from an interjurisdictional <br />perspective. This talk focuses on intra-federal and federal- <br />state relations under the Clean Water Act, the Endangered <br />Species Act, and the Federal Power Act, as well as inter- <br />state conflicts under the equitable apportionment doctrine, <br />state/tribal relations under Indian treaty rights, and inter- <br />national water quality issues. <br /> <br />Interjurisdictional Groundwater Allocation, Emerging <br />Principles and Policies <br />Ann Berkley Rodgers, Attorney, Albuquerque <br />Public awareness of groundwater as a resource distinct from <br />a jurisdiction's land base is relatively new. Approaches to <br />allocation at the international level and within the US. will be <br />discussed, focusing on the pnnciples and pOlicies that guide <br />decision-makers in allocating and regulating groundwater <br />resources. <br /> <br />Lunch <br />Speaker <br /> <br />940 <br /> <br />1010 <br />1020 <br /> <br />11 :00 <br /> <br />11 :45 <br /> <br />PM <br />115 <br /> <br />BASIN STUDIES <br /> <br />The Colorado River Compact: A Breeding Ground for <br />International, National and Interstate Controversies <br />John U. Carlson, Carlson, Hammond & Paddock, Denver <br />This paper will describe the present and future controversies <br />inherent in the law of the Colorado River. The super- <br />imposing of international goals and national environmental <br />policies upon a contract to share common supplies is pro- <br />pelling those -dependent on the River towards a show-down. <br /> <br />Managing the Upper Rio Grande: Old Institutions, New <br />Players <br />Steven J. Shupe; Shupe & Associates, Santa Fe, <br />New Mexico <br />The Upper Rio Grande Basin has been managed for irri- <br />gation and flood control for much of this century under <br />interstate compact and federal laws. These institutions, <br />however, have been tested in recent years by a far more <br />complex set of interests, including fisheries, recreation, river <br />corridor protection, wildlife, Indian rights, water marketing, <br />water quality concerns and others. This presentation looks at <br />possible mechanisms for forming policy and resolving <br />disputes about these issues. <br /> <br />Break <br /> <br />205 <br /> <br />255 <br /> <br />315 Interstate Allocation of the Platte River <br />Prof. J. David Aiken, Dept. of Agriculture & Economics, <br />University of Nebraska <br />Early interstate disputes regarding allocation of Platte river <br />water focused on irrigation uses. These conflicts resulted in a <br />U.S. Supreme Court decree on the North Platte between <br />Nebraska and Wyoming, and an interstate compact between <br />Nebraska and Colorado on the South Platte. More recent <br />conflicts have focused on environmental protection in the <br />central Platte River in Nebraska. <br /> <br />405 The Arkansas River Controversy <br />David W. Robbins, Hill & Robbins, P.C., Denver <br />In December 1985, Kansas filed a lawsuit against Colorado <br />alleging material depletions of the Arkansas River in violation <br />of the Arkansas River Compact. Colorado filed a counter- <br />claim alleging various violations of the same compact by <br />Kansas. This presentation will describe the issues involved in <br />the lawsuit and the current status of the litigation. <br /> <br />5:00 End of day <br /> <br />6:00 Cookout on Flagstaff <br /> <br />Tuesday, June 6, 1989 <br /> <br />AM BASIN STUDIES (con't) <br /> <br />845 Coordinated Water Management in a Basin with Erratic <br />Surface Supplies: the Law North and South of the <br />Pecos <br />Prof. Charles T. DuMars, University of New Mexico School <br />of Law <br />This paper will explore the hydrology of the Pecos River <br />Basin, the Interstate Compact regulating that basin and the <br />implications for state and national water planning strategies. <br /> <br />9:35 The Delaware River Basin: Courts, Compacts <br />& Commissions <br />R. Timothy Weston, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Harrisburg, <br />Pennsylvania <br />Delaware River waters serve the four-state region of the <br />northeast megalopolis. The 50-year experience of litigation <br />and compact commission programs provide a paradigm of <br />maturing interstate management of shared re;;ources. A <br />former Commissioner reflects on the lessons offered for other <br />basins and regions. <br /> <br />1025 Break <br /> <br />1045 The Missouri River: River of Promise or Peril? <br />John E. Thorson, Doney & Thorson, Helena, Montana <br />The Pick-Sloan Plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of <br />1944, was the charter for natural resource development in <br />the Missouri River Basin. The promise of that charter has not <br />been fulfilled and recent controversies-most notably the <br />ETS/ Pipeline Project litigation-have resulted. This <br />presentation reviews the shortcomings of the Pick-Sloan Plan <br />and describes recent efforts of the ten basin states, 27 <br />Indian tribes, and federal agencies to develop new water <br />management approaches for the river. <br /> <br />1135 Lunch (on your own) <br /> <br />PM INTERJURISDICTIONAL TRANSFERS <br /> <br />105 Unique Legal Issues Raised by Long Distance Water <br />Transfer Proposals: ETSI, the Columbia River, NAWAPA <br />Prof. Ralph W. Johnson, University of Washington School <br />of Law, Seattle, Washington <br />Out-of-state, out-of-basin water transfer proposals such as <br />ETSI, the Columbia to the Southwest, and NAWAPA, raise <br />unprecedented legal and policy issues, which the speaker <br />will identify and analyze. <br /> <br />1 :50 ETSI Pipeline: the Future of an Illusion <br />William Janklow, former Governor of South Dakota, Sioux <br />Falls, South Dakota <br />With the ETSI Pipeline, South Dakota attempted to set its <br />own economic agenda by selling Missouri River water for <br />industrial purposes outside the Missouri River basin. This <br />paper Will examine the history and aftermath of the ETSI <br />venture which, In light of the squabbles over western water, <br />was an invitation to disaster. <br />