Laserfiche WebLink
<br />':"'...... .... . w ..-. . ....... <br /> <br />A cenual objective of the Clean Watlr Act - to <br />restOre and maimain the chemical. Ptysical and biological <br />inlepity of the nation's waaers - remains unfulfilled. <br />Clean water is essential to the health and well being of <br />people and ecosyswns. It is neceaary for economic security <br />and sustainability. Despire some progress. many obstaCles <br />5land in the way of maintaining high quality water. Serious <br />remaining problems include: poorly controlled pollured <br />nmotf (nonpoim source discharges) - which accowus for <br />half of national pollution loads; failwe to inregrate land and <br />waler management; fragmented regulatory responsibility; <br />inadequate water quality standards and lax enforcement; and <br />inadequate attention to ecosystem prorection. <br /> <br />EQUITY AND PARTICIPATION IN <br />DECISIONMAKING <br /> <br />Federal and state water policy often has exacted <br />extraordinary social costs. Indian tribes have been prevented <br />from receiving the benefits of federal water development in <br />spite of promises made in treaties and die trust obligation of <br />the United States. Traditional Hispanic communities have <br />seen their acequias and traditional panems of water manage- <br />ment and use overwhelmed by Slate and federal water laws <br />and policies. Millions of people in the South have seen <br />fishing and hunting habitat vanish as wetlands have disap- <br />peared. Numerous nual communities. especially in die <br />West. have had their water supplies tr3nSpOned out of their <br />watersheds to wban centers. <br /> <br />Much of the citizenry as a whole bas been excluded <br />from the making of water policy. The key decisions have <br />been made by large water organizations and their lawyers. <br />engineers. and lobbyists. The field is widely perceived as <br />too complex and forbidding for participation by ordinary <br />citizens. Environmental grouPS. fannworkers organizations. <br />and advocacy organizations representing poor people have <br />provided a vital, though incomplete. remedy for this continu- <br />ing problem of under-representation. <br /> <br />General Principles <br /> <br />· Warer quality problems can best be managed on a <br />waaershed basis. <br /> <br />. Real improvement of the quality of1he nation's <br />waters requires aggressive action to deal with pol- <br />luted runoff. <br /> <br />. Warer quality protection includes and depends on <br />protection and restoration of aquatic ecosystems. <br /> <br />· Pollution should be prevented at its source. <br /> <br />· EffeCtive water quality management requires actions <br />based on the essential link between water quality and <br />water quantity. <br /> <br />· Water quality protection programs should emphasize <br />integrated resource planning and funding arrange- <br />ments tied to the achievement of water quality goals. <br /> <br />General Principles <br /> <br />· The federal govenunem should acknowledge and <br />fulfill the special trust relationship with Indian tribes. <br /> <br />· Decisionmaking should include all affected interest <br />groups. <br /> <br />· Decisionmaking bodies should provide the public <br />with readily understood infonnation and analysis. <br /> <br />· Where a tranSition from old to new values demands <br />reallocation of water from existing uses. ~ equities <br />of people with existing uses established under lawful <br />prior policies should be respected. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />