Laserfiche WebLink
<br />uses. Utah and Wyoming, in their 1986 instream flow legislation, and Colorado, in its <br />1987 amendments to its enabling statute, all specified a single state agency to hold <br />instream water rights established under state law. <br /> <br />This does not mean, however, that private interests are unable to participate in in- <br />place water protection. For example, The Nature Conservancy has either established or <br />purchased and transferred water rights to in-place uses in several states.2S Also, a <br />number of other strategies have been asserted by instream flow advocates to enhance <br />free-flowing waters in the West. As explained below, these include private appropriation <br />of instream water rights, coordination of water uses and reservoir releases, and assertion <br />of the Public Trust Doctrine. <br /> <br />Private Instream Appropriation <br /> <br />Despite the fact that several western legislatures have explicitly prohibited the <br />creation of in-place water rights held by the private sector, individu~ls and organizations <br />in some other western states are asserting this appropriation strategy. Most notably, <br />during the early 1980s an environmental advocacy group applied for two instream flow <br />rights on an ecologically important river in southern Arizona. The state Department of <br />Water Resources approved the applications after determining that fish and wildlife <br />protection is a beneficial water use under Arizona law, a physical diversion is not <br />required for appropriating a new water right, and the applicant had followed the <br />necessary procedures for establishing a valid right. Approval of these two private <br />applications encouraged numerous new instream flow filings in Arizona, submitted by a <br />variety of applicants. <br /> <br />Only in Alaska has a western state legislature explicitly empowered the private <br />sector to participate in an instream flow program as a rights holder. The Alaska Water <br />Use Act allows any person to reserve a quantity of water for stream or lake level <br />maintenance for a number of purposes. These include protection of fish and wildlife <br />habitat, migration and propagation; recreation and park purposes; navigation and <br />transportation; and sanitary and water quality purposes.26 To date, however, no private <br />instream flow rights have been reserved in Alaska. Although a small number of <br />applications have been received by the state, they were found to be procedurally <br />deficient. <br /> <br />Coordinating Water Use and Releases <br /> <br />Because most states prevent the private sector from appropriating instream rights, <br />advocates of free-flowing waters have turned to alternatives to promote their goals. One <br />option is to purchase and dedicate water rights to the state for instream flow protection, <br />but this is often costly. In the Colorado Rockies above Denver, a ten cfs senior irrigation <br /> <br />1-10 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />