Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the same stock. All pelvic-clipped spray-marked and <br />control fish were stocked into the French River, a <br />tributary of Lake Superior. <br />Marked chinook salmon were captured in the French <br />River trap, located approximately 100 m upstream from Lake <br />Superior, during the 1986 through 1989 spawning migrations. <br />Fin-clipped fish were weighed, measured, and sexed, and <br />scale samples were taken. Fish with right pelvic clips <br />were examined under ultraviolet light; the presence and <br />locations of fluorescent dye granules were noted. <br />Survival of spray-marked versus control fish was <br />compared using a Heterogeneity Chi-square test (Snedecor <br />and Cochran 1973). Growth of spray-marked and control fish <br />was compared by back-calculating lengths in each year of <br />life (Missouri Department of Conservation 1989). A body- <br />scale constant of 38 mm was used in back-calculations. A <br />two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of total body length <br />in each year of life was done using mark (spray-marked <br />versus control) and sex as the independent variables <br />(Snedecor and Cochran 1973). The Kolmogorov- <br />Smirnov/Lilliefors test was used to check for normality <br />within each cell of the ANOVAS (Lilliefors 1967). Levene's <br />test was used to check for homogeneity of variance within <br />each cell (Levene 1960). Hypotheses were tested at the <br />0.05 level. Length-weight relationships at capture of <br />spray-marked versus control fish were compared using <br />analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on log transformed data. <br /> <br />4 <br />