My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7606
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:11:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7606
Author
Negus, M. T., D. A. Belford and S. E. Colvin.
Title
Long-term Retention of Fluorescent Pigment Marking of Chinook Salmon.
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
St. Paul, MN.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />they were no longer visible (Evenson and Ewing 1985). <br />Ware's (1968) work with largemouth bass suggested increased <br />mark loss in fast growing fish; the growth rate of chinook <br />salmon is faster still, which may contribute to pigment <br />loss. The greater retention of pigment granules by female <br />chinook salmon than males corresponds to the findings of <br />Evenson and Ewing (l985), who attributed this phenomenon to <br />sexually dimorphic skin characteristics associated with <br />sexual maturation. <br />Mortality attributable to initial pigment application <br />was only 0.5' for the fish used in this study (Bandow <br />1985), which corresponds to the low initial mortality seen <br />in other studies when spray pressures were carefully <br />adjusted (Jackson 1959; Phinney et ale 1967; Hennick and <br />Tyler 1970). Long term survival (from stocking to sexual <br />maturity) of our fish was somewhat diminished, however, in <br />contrast to other studies which report no long-term <br />mortality effects (Phinney et ale 1969; Phinney 1974; <br />Hennick and Tyler 1970). The spray-marked fish exhibited <br />this increased mortality regardless of age at maturity. <br />Fin-clipping is widely reported to adversely affect <br />survival of fish (Weber and Wahle 1969; Nicola and Cordone <br />1973), and it is possible that the cumulative effects of <br />spray-marking and fin-clipping resulted in some increase in <br />mortality among those fish. Migratory straying or <br />misidentification due to fin regeneration may have caused <br />underestimation of the total number of fish surviving to <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.