Laserfiche WebLink
<br />they were no longer visible (Evenson and Ewing 1985). <br />Ware's (1968) work with largemouth bass suggested increased <br />mark loss in fast growing fish; the growth rate of chinook <br />salmon is faster still, which may contribute to pigment <br />loss. The greater retention of pigment granules by female <br />chinook salmon than males corresponds to the findings of <br />Evenson and Ewing (l985), who attributed this phenomenon to <br />sexually dimorphic skin characteristics associated with <br />sexual maturation. <br />Mortality attributable to initial pigment application <br />was only 0.5' for the fish used in this study (Bandow <br />1985), which corresponds to the low initial mortality seen <br />in other studies when spray pressures were carefully <br />adjusted (Jackson 1959; Phinney et ale 1967; Hennick and <br />Tyler 1970). Long term survival (from stocking to sexual <br />maturity) of our fish was somewhat diminished, however, in <br />contrast to other studies which report no long-term <br />mortality effects (Phinney et ale 1969; Phinney 1974; <br />Hennick and Tyler 1970). The spray-marked fish exhibited <br />this increased mortality regardless of age at maturity. <br />Fin-clipping is widely reported to adversely affect <br />survival of fish (Weber and Wahle 1969; Nicola and Cordone <br />1973), and it is possible that the cumulative effects of <br />spray-marking and fin-clipping resulted in some increase in <br />mortality among those fish. Migratory straying or <br />misidentification due to fin regeneration may have caused <br />underestimation of the total number of fish surviving to <br /> <br />9 <br />