Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />The macro invertebrate abundance in the lower Escalante have not been previously studied. The <br />upper reaches above the confluence of The Gulch and the Escalante River and tributaries were <br />sampled incidental to a survey of threatened and endangered fish (McAda et al. 1977). That <br />study showed that Baetis sp. was ubiquitous throughout the sampling area and Rhyacophila sp. <br />dominated headwaters, where as Tipulids and Anisopterans were more prevalent in the lower <br />reaches of the study area. Vinson (1998) collected samples from the upper reaches of the <br />Escalante River, tributaries and a couple ofTinajas. That study found about 70 taxa. Plecoptera <br />were only collected from Steep Creek, which is a tributary of The Gulch. The Trichopteran <br />Rhyacophila was not collected during the 1998 survey. <br /> <br />Rivers naturally change as they flow downstream. Riverain vegetation conditions, light, <br />temperature, hydraulics, and substrate composition all change and in response to these <br />environmental changes macroinvertebrate communities change. The macroinvertebrate <br />abundance in the lower Escalante was low compared to the data collected from the upper <br />Escalante by Vinson (1998). This is not that unusual for river drainages. Vinson sampled in <br />early June when the water level was low. Just before we sampled the lower reaches the water <br />level was elevated. Sampling was confined to the edge of the river due to the high water and <br />scouring could have reduced the abundance. Because this is the first information on <br />macroinvertebrates from the lower Escalante River it begins to establish baseline data against <br />which future data can be compared. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Inventory: A comprehensive study that samples the macroinvertebrates within the mainstem and <br />tributaries of the Escalante at various times of the year should be conducted. This study should <br />include the entire watershed and should not be confined to NPS lands. The data collected would <br />provide the spatial and temporal information required for selecting water quality monitoring sites <br />within the watershed. <br /> <br />Monitoring: As a minimum the NPS should establish a long term monitoring site on the lower <br />Escalante located at the north face of Steven's Arch (UTMx501532y4143206). This site can be <br />accessed by hiking down Coyote Gulch. A suite of physical and chemical parameters should be <br />collected with the macroinvertebrate data to help detect changes in water quality. Other sites <br />might need to be added as information from the inventory is gathered. <br /> <br />REFERENCES <br /> <br />Bode, R. W., M. A. Novak, and L. E. Abele. 1991. Methods for Rapid Biological Assessment <br />of Streams. New York Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, New York. <br /> <br />8 <br />