My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9592
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9592
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:08:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9592
Author
Mueller, G. A., J. Carpenter and P. C. Marsh.
Title
Cibola High Levee Pond Annual Report 2004.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />t <br /> <br />sorted by time periods designated as dusk (1945 to 2200), mid-hours (2215 to <br />0315), and dawn (0330 to 0545), and by fish pulse code number. <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />Point Data Analysis. During the course of study in 2003 it was discovered that at <br />times some signals originated from within the interstices of the large material <br />used to construct the high levee. It was presumed that individual signals were <br />associated with individual fish. The high levee thus was divided into 26, 5 m <br />wide "zones," consecutively designated with alpha characters A through Z. <br />Signal detections and fish locations were referenced and recorded by zone. <br /> <br />Point data were entered into a two-way spatial distribution table that represented <br />the number of times each fish was observed within each zone of the high levee. <br />The table was used to create a histogram for each fish that depicted the number <br />of times it was contacted within each zone, and a cumulative histogram was <br />constructed that showed the total number of contacts within each zone for all fish <br />combined. A two-way goodness-of-fit test using the Pearson Chi-square statistic <br />(Sokal and Rohlf 1995) was performed for nonrandom association of specific fish <br />with a specific zone(s) to determine if there was any fidelity to a particular zone, <br />or if fish simply were found at random among the 26 zones. <br /> <br />2004 Data Evaluation. Point data were plotted on an area map of Cibola HLP to <br />show known locations and presumed fate of individual fish. <br /> <br />Results and Discussion <br /> <br />Bonytail tagged in 2003 (n=10) ranged in total length from 404 to 514 mm with a <br />mean of 453 (Table 1). Fish from 2004 (n = 9) were smaller; 250 to 301 mm long <br />with mean of 284 mm and weight of 101 to 159 g with a mean of 138 g (Table 2). <br /> <br />Tracking during 2003 was conducted for up to four days each week from release <br />of fish on 19 March to end of the experiment on 07 May. These large bony tail <br />showed a strong tendency during daylight hours to occupy the interstices of the <br />large material that was used to construct the high levee, and visited the open <br />water of the Cibola HLP almost exclusively during darkness. In fact, there was <br />virtually no evidence that any fish utilized open water during daylight. Our initial <br />failure during daylight to detect signals using a directional hydrophone anywhere <br />in the pond a week after fish were tagged and released resulted in a point search <br />using the omni-directional probe. Discovery of fish using the interstices of the <br />high levee was serendipitous and quite a surprise. <br /> <br />Point Data. A total of 32 point surveys of the high levee were performed: 16 in <br />the morning and 16 in the evening. The number of contacts per fish ranged from <br />26 to 32, signals were encountered at19 of the 26 designated zones, and total <br />number of contacts (all fish combined) per zone ranged from 1 to 63 (Table 3). <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.