Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. Physical Habitat <br /> <br />a. Water Ouality-CHLP is hydraulically connected to the river. It appears <br />ground water upwells at the pond's greatest depth and helps to circulate and <br />maintain good water quality. The water gradient flows from the river through <br />CHLP toward Pretty Water following the historic course ofthe river. Surface <br />water temperatures did reach 340C this summer, however, diel temperature <br />cycles of 3-40C combined with river influx helps to suppress thermal and <br />chemical stratification. This circulation maintains sufficient dissolved oxygen <br />in nearly 95% of the ponds volume. <br /> <br />b. Cover Complexity-The pond affords native fish ample cover in the form of <br />seasonal (vegetative) and permanent (rip-raplbeaver cavities) structure and <br />depth (>3 m). Cover provides protection from predators and thermal <br />protection from the sun. <br /> <br />c. Water Depth-Water depth fluctuates seasonally due to river elevation. <br />Summer depths reach 3.4 m compared to just 2+ m during winter months. <br />The concentration of fish at depth during summer months suggests this <br />additional depth may provide a thermal refuge (<31 OC). <br /> <br />d. Spawning Habitat-Substrate conditions provide a wide range of particle <br />sizes and materials, some being successfully used by spawners. Razorback <br />suckers are using graveVcobble substrate at the river levee's toe (> 1.5m <br />depth) and bonytail are using small (2-5 em) cobble located (0.1 - 1.0 m <br />depth) on the river levee. <br /> <br />3. Relative Size and Location <br /> <br />The small size and steep banks of the pond make it less attractive to predatory birds, <br />compared to broader, shallower habitats found nearby. The pond is located in a <br />relatively isolated area, which reduces human use and bait bucket introductions. The <br />pond also has a higher bank cover to pond volume ratio. <br /> <br />CHLP has provided bony tail and razorback sucker a habitat where they have sustained a natural <br />population for nearly a decade. Colonization by largemouth bass was unfortunate, but quite <br />frankly inevitable. As pointed out by Minckley et al. (2003), these communities are temporary <br />and must be managed accordingly. At CHLP, it appears that natural recruitment occurred in 11 <br />of the past 12 years for bonytail (since 1994) and in at least 5 of the 12 years for razorbacks. <br />Compared to any other conservation or recovery action in the Colorado River basin, this is <br />simply remarkable. <br /> <br />Management Plan for CHLP- The discovery that largemouth bass had successfully spawned <br />in CHLP signifies the eventual failure of native recruitment. Native fish recruitment will simply <br />cease when predator numbers reach a certain threshold that exceeds native fish production. We <br />anticipate that will be soon; within 1 to 3 years, depending on how rapidly the bass population <br /> <br />19 <br />