My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9592
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9592
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:08:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9592
Author
Mueller, G. A., J. Carpenter and P. C. Marsh.
Title
Cibola High Levee Pond Annual Report 2004.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />and to consider the impact of other small-bodied non-natives on razorback larvae as well. We <br />have focused on non-natives that are common in the lower Colorado River. <br /> <br />This was the second year of predator/prey tank tests. In 2003, we tested red shiner, young of the <br />year (yay) and adult rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and yay bluegill (Lepomis <br />macrochirus) and bonytail (as a native "control" species) on razorback larvae <15 mm. We also <br />tested young channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), largemouth bass (Micropterus salrnoides), <br />and yellow bullhead (Ameiurus natalis) on larvae that were 15-30 mm. In 2004, we tested <br />predation on razorback eggs as well as on larvae <15 mm. Razorback sucker eggs and larvae <br />were supplied by USFWS while non-natives were captured nearby or purchased from <br />aquaculturists. All tests in 2004 were conducted at the Achii Hanyo Fish Facility. Details of the <br />experimental design can be found in our 2003 Annual Report (Mueller et al. 2003). <br /> <br />At least two control tanks (eggs or larvae with no predator) were used in each predator trial. <br />Trials ended when we removed predators and counted either the number of visible eggs or <br />surviving larvae. Weights, lengths, and gape measurements of predators were recorded at the <br />completion of experiments. <br /> <br />Egg Predation Experiments-We tested the ability of tadpoles and crayfish to prey upon <br />razorback sucker eggs. Our methodology was simple: we placed 20 eggs in 10-gal tanks with no <br />substrate, added either four tadpoles or two crayfish to treatment tanks, and measured predation <br />after a set time period. We used eggs in control tanks to determine if we could accurately count <br />eggs after 72 hours or if they disintegrated beyond recognition; this occurred to one egg in 1 of 6 <br />control tanks used in these egg predation trials. During the experiment we provided tadpoles and <br />crayfish with alternative food sources, including lettuce, bloodworms, and live and frozen brine <br />shrimp. Razorback eggs were obtained from Willow Beach hatchery. We originally planned to <br />run both trials for 72 hours. However, crayfish consumed the eggs rapidly, so in order to obtain <br />instantaneous predation rates we ended these trials after six hours of exposure. <br /> <br />Egg predation experiments were conducted from 15-18 March (Table 1). Both species consumed <br />razorback eggs; predation averaged 74% for crayfish and 45% for tadpoles. In terms of <br />instantaneous predation rates, tadpoles consumed a mean of 0.03 eggs per tadpole per hour <br />(Table 2). Crayfish were more voracious, eating on average 1.1 eggs per crayfish per hour. <br /> <br />Lan-al Predation Experiments-Experiments on razorback larvae ran from 15-30 March 2004. <br />We tested predation capability of bullfrog tadpoles; young-of-year green sunfish, carp, and <br />channel catfish; and adult threadfin shad (Dorosomapetenense) and fathead minnow <br />(Pimephales promelas). All species that we tested consumed razorback sucker larvae. Mean <br />mortality of larvae ranged from ,::::10% in tanks with tadpoles, threadfin shad, and fathead <br />minnows, and 2:.70% for carp, green sunfish, and channel catfish. There was no consistent <br />relationship between gape size and consumption rate (Table 1). Mortality in the ten larval control <br />tanks was insignificant: one larvae died in a carp trial and one in a tadpole trial. <br />Compared to the other predator species used in 2004, bullfrog tadpoles were one of the largest <br />predators tested, in terms of both total length and biomass (Table 1). However, the tadpoles had a <br />small gape relative to their size, and they ate relatively few larvae. Their instantaneous predation <br />rates were nearly identical to threadfin shad and fathead minnows (Table 2). Threadfm shad is <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.