My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7995
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:03:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7995
Author
Mussetter, R. A. and M. D. Harvey.
Title
Yampa River Endangered Fish Species Habitat Investigations.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Ref. No. 93-166.01,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />At the head of the riffle (XS 12.1), which is indicative of conditions associated with formation of <br />the tertiary bar along the left bank at this location, the material is in motion at all discharges greater than <br />about 1,000 cfs (Figure 3.10). Backwater from the bend clearly creates conditions that form the primary <br />bar and reduce the shear stress at high flow at the base of the riffle. Because of the height of the riffle, <br />however, the backwater is insufficient to affect the hydraulics at the head of the bar (Figure 3.6). <br /> <br />Based on the results of the above analysis, it can be concluded that: <br /> <br />1. Discharges greater than about 25,000 cfs are required to transport gravel and cobble sized <br />material through the upstream pool (XS 13 and XS 14) and into the reach containing the <br />primary bar (Figures 3.9, 3.10). <br /> <br />2. Based on the cross sectionally averaged dimensionless shear stress, any coarse grained <br />material carried through the upstream pool will deposit on the bar under the full range of flows <br />modeled (up to 32,300 cfs) (Figure 3.9). <br /> <br />3. Based on the maximum shear stresses in the channel, material delivered across the riffle at the <br />head of the primary bar can be transported through the reach along the bar at discharges <br />greater than about 5,000 cfs, but appear to be stopped in the bend at discharges less than <br />about 22,000 cfs (Figure 3.10). <br /> <br />4. The bank-attached bar between XS 5 and XS 6 is related to local flow separation which causes <br />deposition of coarse material transported through XS 6 at discharges greater than about 5,000 <br />cfs. At lower flows, this bar is probably inactive. <br /> <br />5. At the base of the riffle near the head of the bar (XS 10), coarse materials can be mobDized at <br />flows greater than about 630 cfs. However, due to the backwater created by the downstream <br />bend, the dimensionless critical shear stress stays very close to critical conditions over the full <br />range of flows modeled, actually decreasing slightly above about 2,000 cfs (Figure 3.13). <br /> <br />6. The analyses indicate that, if near critical conditions (incipient motion) are necessary for the <br />creation of suitable spawning habitat, these conditions are met over a broad range of flows <br />above about 630 cfs near the base of the riffle. In contrast, the bank-attached bar between XS <br />5 and XS 6 and the bar at the head of the riffle near XS 12.1 are near critical conditions over <br />a very narrow range of flows (near 5,000 cfs and 1000 cfs, respectively). At both of these <br />locations, higher flows increase the shear stress significantly above the incipient motion <br />condition, which results in high rates of sediment transport that would make the locations <br />unsuitable for spawning. <br /> <br />3.2. Cleopatras Couch (RM 16.5) <br /> <br />In order to address the question of the required frequency of bar building events at the known <br />squawfish spawning sites it is necessary to develop a data base consisting of topographic changes and <br />sedimentologic changes through time. Bar building occurs as a result of both vertical accretion of the <br />bar as well in-filling of the eroded chute channels. The maximum bar elevation is controlled by the local <br />hydraulic conditions and it is reasonable to assume that the highest portions of the bar at present <br /> <br />3.27 Resource Consultants & Engineers. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.