My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7995
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:03:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7995
Author
Mussetter, R. A. and M. D. Harvey.
Title
Yampa River Endangered Fish Species Habitat Investigations.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Ref. No. 93-166.01,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Dc = <br /> <br />1" <br /> <br />(3.3) <br /> <br />1'. (y s -y ) <br />c <br /> <br />Reported values for 't *c for the median particle size of the surface bed material range from 0.03 <br />(Meyer-Peter and Muller 1948; Neill 1968) to 0.06 (Shields 1936). A value of 0.047 is commonly used <br />in engineering practice based on the Meyer-Peter. Muller bedload transport equation (Meyer-Peter. <br />Muller, 1948). More recent studies indicate that a value of 0.03 may be more reasonable for gravel and <br />cobble bed streams (Parker et at. 1982; Andrews 1983). For purposes of this analysis. incipient <br />conditions were computed using values of 't *c of 0.03 and 0.047 to address the range of conditions <br />associated with uncertainty in selection of single appropriate value. The bed shear stress due to grain <br />resistance ('t ') is a better descriptor of near-bed hydraulic energy in gravel-cobble bed streams than the <br />more commonly used total shear stress because it eliminates the effects of flow resistance due to <br />irregularities in the channel boundary. nonlinearity of the channel. variations in channel width, and other <br />factors that contribute to the total flow depth. but not the energy available to move individual particles <br />on the channel bed (Einstein 1950; Mussetter 1989). The grain shear stress ('t') is computed from the <br />following relation: <br /> <br />l' = yylS <br /> <br />(3.4) <br /> <br />where Y' is the portion of the total hydraulic depth associated with grain resistance (Einstein 1950) <br />and S is the energy slope at the cross section. The value of Y' is computed by iteratively solving the <br />semilogarithmic velocity profile equation: <br /> <br />V <br />v' <br />. <br /> <br />yl <br />= 5. 75 +6 . 251 og ( - ) <br />Ks <br /> <br />(3.5) <br /> <br />where V is the mean velocity at the cross section. ~ is the characteristic roughness height of the bed. <br />and V; is the shear velocity due to grain resistance given by: <br /> <br />v.' = JgylS . <br /> <br />(3.6) <br /> <br />The characteristic roughness height of the bed (Ks) was assumed to be 3.5 084 (Hey 1979). where 084 <br />is the particle size for which 84 percent of the bed material is smaller. The average 084 of the bar <br />surface sediments is about 123 mm (4.8 in.) (based on MH7 and MH8) and that of riffles or tertiary bars <br />in the study reach is approximately 146 mm (5.7 in.) (Figure 3.7). Mean velocities predicted by the <br />HEC-2 model vary from less than 0.5 fps in the pool area upstream of the primary bar (XS 14 - Figure <br /> <br />3.16 Resource Consultants & Engineers. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.