My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7995
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:03:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7995
Author
Mussetter, R. A. and M. D. Harvey.
Title
Yampa River Endangered Fish Species Habitat Investigations.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Ref. No. 93-166.01,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />indicating the backwater condition at higher flows (Figure 3.5). To account for the loss of energy <br />through the bend, the contraction and expansion loss coefficients applied to the bend cross sections <br />were increased until the computed water surface and energy profiles were consistent with the measured <br />high-water marks. The computed water-surface elevations at the discharges used to verify the model <br />compare well with the measured elevations, including the steep profile (indicating significant energy loss) <br />through the bend for the higher flows. <br /> <br />After performing the above adjustments to the model, a multiple-profile run was made for several <br />discharges between 300 cfs and 32,300 cfs. The results were then used to evaluate the variation in bed <br />shear stress and incipient motion of the bed material with discharge at specific locations within the <br />reach. Two significant hydraulic controls exist within the study reach. As previously discussed, the <br />bend and constriction of the main channel between XS 3 and XS 5 creates significant energy loss. <br />Additionally, the riffle at the head of the primary bar controls the water-surface profile upstream of the <br />study reach, and creates very high velocities through the riffle. These conditions are illustrated in figure <br />3.6; where it can be seen that the water surface slope and the energy gradient increase with increasing <br />discharge in the bend, and a significant drop in the water surface and energy gradeline occurs in the <br />riffle between XS 10 and XS 12.1. The multiple profile analysis indicates that the primary bar is entirely <br />inundated at a discharge of about 22,000 cfs. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analysis is based on a one-dimensional solution to a multi-dimensional problem, <br />and as such, local velocities and shear stress can vary significantly from the cross-section averages <br />predicted by the HEC-2 model. However, the present analysis clearly defines the variation in hydraulic <br />energy that occurs over a range of discharges at various locations at the site. <br /> <br />Incipient Motion Analysis <br /> <br />The critical particle size (Dc; particle size that is on the verge of motion) for the range of <br />discharges modeled was estimated using the Shields' (1936) relation: <br /> <br />T = T (y -y) D <br />c .c s <br /> <br />(3.2) <br /> <br />where 't c is the critical shear stress, 't *c is the dimensionless critical shear stress, y s is the unit <br />weight of sediment (-165lb/ft~, y is the unit weight of water (62.4Ib/ft~, and D is the particle size. <br />Dc is obtained by substituting the grain shear stress ('t') for 't c and Dc for D in Equation (3.2), and <br />rearranging into the following form: <br /> <br />3.13 Resource Consultants & Engineers, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.