Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Green River were connected to the mainchannel until at least early July in 1993 and early <br />August in 1995, but habitats were disconnected from the mainchannel as early as mid June in <br />1994 (R. T. Muth and E. J. Wick, personal observations). The effects of spring through early <br />summer flow and sediment-transport regimes in the middle Green River during 1993-1996 <br />(related to timing and magnitude of peak releases from Flaming Gorge Dam and peak flows in <br />the Yampa River) on physical conditions at the primary razorback sucker spawning area in the <br />Escalante reach will be evaluated in a Ph.D. dissertation being prepared by E. J. Wick. <br />Low reservoir levels in Lake Powell during spring and early summer 1993 resulted in <br />flowing, lotic conditions throughout the Colorado River inflow, whereas. in 1994 and 1995, <br />non-flowing, more lentic conditions existed in the Colorado River inflow as far upstream as <br />Palmer Canyon (RK 312.8) or Gypsum Canyon (RK 314.4). <br />Daily water temperature data for 19 May-7 July 1995 inside Millard Canyon (at about 10 <br />and 200 m from mouth) and in a flooded wash at Bonita Bend are presented in Appendix C. At <br />all three sites. water temperatures over each day typically fluctuated 10C or less; daily <br />fluctuations were greatest inside Millard Canyon at the site about 200 m from mouth and least <br />in the flooded wash at Bonita Bend (wash was shaded by overhanging bank vegetation). Water <br />temperatures inside Millard Canyon ranged from 14 (29 May) to 200C (27-29 June) at the site <br />about 10 m from mouth and, after first inundation by mainchannel Green River water on 21 <br />May, 12 (17 June) to 220C (3 July) at the site about 200 m from mouth. Water temperatures in <br />the flooded wash at Bonita Bend ranged from 15 (29 May) to 180C (2 July) and were influenced <br />by mixing with mainchannel water. <br /> <br />Fish Collections: 1993, 1994 (Objectives 1-4), and 1995 (Objective 1) <br /> <br />Floating quatrefoil light traps (Southern Concepts, Inc.) with 2 or 4-mm wide fish-entry <br />slots and 1.6-mm mesh. 1-m deep X 3-m long seines were used to collect fish. Preliminary <br />results of the laboratory study to evaluate effectiveness of several types of light traps indicated <br />that the trap designed by Southern Concepts, Inc. would effectively sample razorback sucker <br />larvae. light traps were usually deployed overnight (set near sunset and retrieved before <br />sunrise), and seining was conducted during daylight. All juvenile Colorado squawfish collected <br />were examined for presence of latex marks (mark-recapture study conducted by USFWS and <br />LFL in the middle and lower Green River; 1994 and 1995 only), measured to the nearest mm <br />total length (TL), and released alive near point of capture. In 1994. fish in light-trap samples <br />with high numbers of sucker larvae were anesthetized in a 100 mgll solution of MS-222 <br />(concentration used was based on preliminary results of laboratory experiments). Sucker <br />larvae in those samples were identified and measured to the nearest mm TL alive in the field <br />under a stereo-zoom dissecting microscope. and selected specimens were placed in styrofoam <br />coolers with aerated water and taken to the LFL for rearing. Other fish collected were killed <br />with an overdose of MS-222, preserved in 100% ethanol or 10% formalin, and taken to LFL for <br />processing. In the laboratory, preserved fish were identified to species, endangered fish were <br />measured to the nearest mm TL. and other fish were grouped by 5-mm TL intervals. <br />Time light traps were set during darkness was recorded for each sample, and catch per <br />effort (CPE) for each species was computed as number of fish per 10 h. Similarly, area seined <br />was measured for each sample collected in 1994 and 1995, and CPE for each species was <br />computed as number of fish per 10m2. For comparison with other studies in the upper <br />Colorado River basin, the geometric mean of sample CPE's (GMcPE) for each species was <br />calculated to determine catch rates. <br /> <br />4 <br />