Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />Correlations among years of peak, daily mean, and total discharges in April-July with monthly <br />degree-days were negative, but only a few coefficients were strong or significant (Table 5). The general <br />weak-moderate degree of association for these comparisons was primarily a result of increased rate of <br />warmimg in 1984. Numbers of degree-days per month were similar in 1982 and 1984 even though date of <br />annual peak discharge occurred 12-13 d earlier in 1982 than in 1984, and values of monthly discharge <br />parameters in April-July were greater (especially for May and June) in 1984 than in 1982 However, as <br />noted, flows following annual peak discharge decreased at a faster rate in 1984 than in 1982. Compared to <br />1982 and 1984, cumulative numbers of degree-days over the five temperature thresholds for the April-July <br />period were 4-26% lower in 1983. Other than noted differences in values of monthly discharge parameters <br />among these three years, date of annual peak discharge in 1983 occurred 13 d later than in 1984 and 25-26 <br />d later than in 1982 and rate of decrease in flows following annual peak discharge was faster in 1984 than <br />in 1983. When assessing effects of discharge on water temperature and rate of warming, characteristics of <br />annual flow regimes other than magnitude of discharge, such as time of peak discharge and rate of <br />decrease in flows following peak discharge, must be considered. <br />Mean values of water temperatures in low-velocity habitats we sampled were typically greater than <br />or equal to maximum daily water temperatures of the mainchannel on the same dates in each year studied <br />(Figure 4). However, seasonal patterns for water temperatures in these habitats closely tracked those <br />recorded for mainchannel temperatures. Therefore, mainchannel water temperatures appeared to be <br />adequate indicators of trends in thermal conditions of the lower Yampa River. <br /> <br />Fish Data <br /> <br />The eight fishes selected for our analyses were represented by 92,482 age-O (all taxa) or older <br />(nonnatives only) fish from a total of 1,067 seine samples collected during 1980-1984. Of that total catch, <br />81,239 fISh were classified as age-O and, of these, about 70% represented native taxa. This high <br />representation by native taxa agrees with conclusions of Tyus and Karp (1989) that, at least in terms of <br />abundance, native fishes dominate the Yampa River fish community. Over the five years studied, within <br />the native group, Gila sp. constituted 50% of the total catch, speckled dace 27%, bluehead sucker 18%, <br />and Dannelmouth sucker 5%. Within the nonnative group, red shiner constituted 53% of the total catch of <br />age-O fish and 38% of the total catch of age-l + fish, sand shiner 11 and 31 %, fathead minnow 32 and 11 %, <br />and redside shiner 4 and 19%. Annual abundance of fish in each taxon varied considerably for most taxa <br />among years. <br /> <br />Spawning periods.- Taxon-specific variation in estimated number of days to initiation of spawning <br />(SPA WN-1) and total number of days in the spawning period (SPAWN - T) occurred among years for both <br />native and especially nonnative fishes. However, annual spawning periods were mostly consistent among <br />