Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />3-47 <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />Allred (1997) studied channel narrowing and vertical accretion in the Green River at the <br />Green River, Utah, gage and described the process by which in-channel deposits become stabilized. <br />The stabilization process included the following steps: (1) emplacement and accretion of a lateral <br />bar as large amounts of sediment are moved through the system, (2) low flood magnitude in years <br />following bar emplacement, (3) rapid encroachment of riparian vegetation onto the exposed bar <br />surface, (4) stabilization of the bar through extensive root system development, and (5) continued <br />vertical accretion of the bar surface during periods of inundation when existing vegetation captures <br />additional sediment. <br /> <br />Channel narrowing at this location occurred from 1930 to 1938; rapid accretion occurred <br />from 1957 to 1962; and further narrowing occurred after 1962 (Allred 1997; Allred and Schmidt <br />1999). The 2-year flood decreased from 1,190 m3/s for the period of 1895 to 1929, to 800 m3/s <br />between 1930 and 1957, and finally to 635 m3/s after dam closure. This research indicates that <br />channel narrowing occurred in response to weather changes and as vegetation (primarily tamarisk <br />Tamarix ramosissima) invaded and stabilized newly formed inset floodplain deposits. The large <br />floods of 1983 and 1984 did not reverse the narrowing trend at this site but instead resulted in the <br />deposition of sediments at higher elevations. <br /> <br />O'Brien (1998) proposed in-channel maintenance flows for the Ouray portion of Reach 2 <br />and the Canyonlands portion of Reach 3 on the basis of calculated incipient motion values for sand <br />particles. These proposed in-channel maintenance flows would perform the physical process of <br />reworking large sand bars and returning the sand to the deeper portions of the channel bed after the <br />spring peak flow, thus preventing vegetation encroachment, bar attachment, and channel narrowing. <br />Calculated in-channel maintenance flows ranged from 142 to 467 m3/s (mean 235 m3/s) in Reach 2 <br />and 170 to 261 m3/s (mean 208 m3/s) in Reach 3 (O'Brien 1998). These moderate in-channel flows <br />would assist in keeping the channel active, reworking in-channel sand bars, and reducing the impact <br />of sediment deposition in sensitive habitat areas. <br /> <br />3.6.5 Floodplain Inundation <br /> <br />Floodplains develop along rivers where the valley floor is extensively covered with <br />alluvium. The normal-flow channel, carved in the alluvium, is flanked by this low-relief surface that <br />becomes part of the river bed during high-flow periods. Floodplains are primarily depositional <br />landforms formed by lateral and vertical accretion of sediment deposits. These areas serve as <br />important nursery and growth and conditioning habitats for endangered fishes in the Green River, <br />particularly the razorback sucker. The frequency and extent of floodplain inundation vary <br />considerably along the Green River and are largely a function of site-specific channel morphology <br />(including the presence or absence of natural or manmade levees). <br /> <br />Irving and Burdick (1995) conducted an inventory, largely on the basis of aerial <br />photography, of potential flooded bottomland habitats in the Green River. They determined that <br />approximately 644, 3,500, and 3,300 ha were present in Reaches 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In <br />