Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />3-3 <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />Climate varies considerably across the Green River basin. In the semiarid rangelands, which <br />make up most of the basin's area, annual precipitation is generally less than 25 em per year. In <br />contrast, many of the mountainous areas that rim the upper portion of the basin receive, on average, <br />more than 100 em of precipitation per year. <br /> <br />Most of the total annual stream flow in the Green River basin is provided by snowmelt. <br />Because of this, natural flow is very high in late spring and early summer and diminishes rapidly in <br />midsummer. Although flows in late summer through autumn can increase following rain events, <br />natural flow in late summer through winter is generally low. <br /> <br />Water and sediment inputs to the Green River and its tributaries are not uniformly <br />distributed across the basin. The principal water sources are high-elevation areas, especially in the <br />northeast portion of the basin. Conversely, the semiarid parts of the basin at lower elevations <br />contribute most of the sediment. Ioms et al. (1965) estimated the annual suspended sediment <br />discharge of the Green River basin to be 25,340,910 metric tons prior to regulation. About 13% of <br />the suspended load of the entire Green River basin was found to originate in the Green River basin <br />upstream of the Yampa River confluence. About 6% originates from the Yampa River basin, about <br />26% originates from the Green River basin between the Yampa and White Rivers, and about 54% <br />originates from the basin downstream of the White River. <br /> <br />Dams and reservoirs have been constructed in the basin mainly to supply water for irrigated <br />agriculture (Table 3.1), and these facilities have resulted in reductions in Green River flow. Table 3.2 <br />lists estimated depletions for 1998 due to water development in the basin. The largest depletion in <br />the Green River basin occurs in the Duchesne River basin. <br /> <br />In addition to depleting flow volume, reservoirs modify the pattern of flow in the Green <br />River to meet demands of irrigation, power generation, recreation, and other uses. Generally, the <br />larger the reservoir is in relation to its watershed, the greater is its potential to modify the natural <br />flow pattern. Of the reservoirs in the basin, Flaming Gorge, which is capable of storing <br />approximately twice the annual inflow, has the largest effect on Green River flow patterns. <br /> <br />Flaming Gorge Dam has reduced the sediment load in the river downstream. This reduction <br />results primarily from the presence of the dam (rather than operations), which traps sediment. <br />Following completion of the dam, Andrews (1986) estimated that mean annual sediment discharge <br />at the USGS gage near Jensen, Utah, decreased by 54% when compared with the average annual pre- <br />dam suspended sediment load. Similarly, the decrease in mean-annual sediment load at the USGS <br />gage near Green Ri ver, Utah, was estimated to be 48 % following completion of Flaming Gorge Dam <br />(Andrews 1986). Andrews noted that the decrease in mean annual suspended sediment load at Jensen <br />is approximately equal to the incoming sediment load to Flaming Gorge Reservoir. At Green River, <br />Andrews noted that the decrease in suspended sediment load following reservoir closure greatly <br />exceeded the amount of sediment trapped in the reservoir. He concluded that sediment inflow to the <br />Green River downstream from the Duchesne River exceeds the transport of sediment out of Reach 3. <br />