Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />1-8 <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />some areas and, by stabilizing sediment deposits, gradually made the channel narrower and deeper, <br />with steep banks. <br /> <br />The Yampa River is the largest remaining essentially unregulated river in the upper <br />Colorado River basin, and its inflow into the Green River, 105 km downstream of Flaming Gorge <br />Dam, ameliorates some effects of dam operation on river flow, sediment load, and temperature. As <br />a result, endangered fishes in the Green River are now primarily restricted to sections downstream <br />of the Yampa River confluence (Figure 1.1), where they occupy habitats also used by 21 nonnative <br />fish species (Table 4.2). Holden (1980) concluded that flows from the Yampa River, especially <br />spring peak flows, were crucial to the maintenance of the Green Ri ver' s "large-river" characteristics <br />and, therefore, very important to maintaining suitable conditions in the Green River downstream of <br />the confluence. He speculated that loss of natural flows from tributaries of the Green River, <br />especially the Yampa River, could push the endangered fish species closer to extinction and <br />recommended against regulation of Yampa Ri ver flows (Holden 1980). <br /> <br />In 1990, the Service developed interim flow recommendations for the Yampa River <br />(USFWS 1990c) that were based on a review of existing biological data on endangered fishes in the <br />Green and Yampa rivers (Tyus and Karp 1989). Those interim recommendations called for <br />preservation of a natural seasonal pattern of flows in the Yampa River, including spring peak flows <br />that reflected the natural hydrologic regime and base flows equal to the 50% flow-exceedance level2 <br />as measured at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gage near Deerlodge Park. The recommended <br />interim flows followed a "stair-stepped" pattern that reflected the use of mean monthly flows for a <br />given period. Harvey et a1. (1993) identified the importance of the high spring peak flows in the <br />Yampa River for creating and maintaining conditions to promote spawning by Colorado pikeminnow <br />on cobble and gravel bars. Modde and Smith (1995) reexamined the interim recommendations in <br />light of additional studies conducted on endangered fishes in the Green and Yampa Rivers in order <br />to develop revised flow recommendations. They identified a need to maintain natural variability by <br />allowing flows to be driven by natural daily variability instead of average monthly flows. Additional <br />recommendations for August-October base flows needed by sub adult and adult Colorado <br />pikeminnow in the Yampa River were made by Modde et a1. (1999), in which a minimum target base <br />flow of about 3 m3/s was identified. <br /> <br />Flows in other tributaries, especially the Duchesne, White, Price, and San Rafael Rivers, <br />also are important to the maintenance of conditions in the Green River. The Service developed <br />preliminary flow recommendations for the Duchesne River (USFWS 1998b) that identified flows <br />for all months of the year under wet (25% exceedance), average (50% exceedance), and dry (75% <br />exceedance) hydrologic conditions. Additional research is underway to refine flow recommendations <br />for the Duchesne Ri ver. The Service currently is in the process of developing flow recommendations <br />for the White River, and it is anticipated that flow recommendations for other Green River tributaries <br />also will be developed in the future. <br /> <br />2Exceedance values refer to the percentage of recorded flows that are higher than that value. An exceedance <br />value is equivalent to 1 minus the percentile. <br />