My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8188
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8188
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:57:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8188
Author
Muth, R. T., et al.
Title
Flow and Temperature Recommendations for Endangered Fishes in the Green River Downstream of Flaming Forge Dam.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Final Report <br /> <br />1-8 <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />some areas and, by stabilizing sediment deposits, gradually made the channel narrower and deeper, <br />with steep banks. <br /> <br />The Yampa River is the largest remaining essentially unregulated river in the upper <br />Colorado River basin, and its inflow into the Green River, 105 km downstream of Flaming Gorge <br />Dam, ameliorates some effects of dam operation on river flow, sediment load, and temperature. As <br />a result, endangered fishes in the Green River are now primarily restricted to sections downstream <br />of the Yampa River confluence (Figure 1.1), where they occupy habitats also used by 21 nonnative <br />fish species (Table 4.2). Holden (1980) concluded that flows from the Yampa River, especially <br />spring peak flows, were crucial to the maintenance of the Green Ri ver' s "large-river" characteristics <br />and, therefore, very important to maintaining suitable conditions in the Green River downstream of <br />the confluence. He speculated that loss of natural flows from tributaries of the Green River, <br />especially the Yampa River, could push the endangered fish species closer to extinction and <br />recommended against regulation of Yampa Ri ver flows (Holden 1980). <br /> <br />In 1990, the Service developed interim flow recommendations for the Yampa River <br />(USFWS 1990c) that were based on a review of existing biological data on endangered fishes in the <br />Green and Yampa rivers (Tyus and Karp 1989). Those interim recommendations called for <br />preservation of a natural seasonal pattern of flows in the Yampa River, including spring peak flows <br />that reflected the natural hydrologic regime and base flows equal to the 50% flow-exceedance level2 <br />as measured at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gage near Deerlodge Park. The recommended <br />interim flows followed a "stair-stepped" pattern that reflected the use of mean monthly flows for a <br />given period. Harvey et a1. (1993) identified the importance of the high spring peak flows in the <br />Yampa River for creating and maintaining conditions to promote spawning by Colorado pikeminnow <br />on cobble and gravel bars. Modde and Smith (1995) reexamined the interim recommendations in <br />light of additional studies conducted on endangered fishes in the Green and Yampa Rivers in order <br />to develop revised flow recommendations. They identified a need to maintain natural variability by <br />allowing flows to be driven by natural daily variability instead of average monthly flows. Additional <br />recommendations for August-October base flows needed by sub adult and adult Colorado <br />pikeminnow in the Yampa River were made by Modde et a1. (1999), in which a minimum target base <br />flow of about 3 m3/s was identified. <br /> <br />Flows in other tributaries, especially the Duchesne, White, Price, and San Rafael Rivers, <br />also are important to the maintenance of conditions in the Green River. The Service developed <br />preliminary flow recommendations for the Duchesne River (USFWS 1998b) that identified flows <br />for all months of the year under wet (25% exceedance), average (50% exceedance), and dry (75% <br />exceedance) hydrologic conditions. Additional research is underway to refine flow recommendations <br />for the Duchesne Ri ver. The Service currently is in the process of developing flow recommendations <br />for the White River, and it is anticipated that flow recommendations for other Green River tributaries <br />also will be developed in the future. <br /> <br />2Exceedance values refer to the percentage of recorded flows that are higher than that value. An exceedance <br />value is equivalent to 1 minus the percentile. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.