My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8022
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:55:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8022
Author
Muth, R. T., et al.
Title
Reproduction and Early Life History of Razorback Sucker in the Green River, Utah and Colorado, 1992-1996.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
34,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />overbank flooding must be matched with the temporal distribution of razorback sucker larvae in <br />the river (Modde 1997). We estimated that, in most years during 1993-1996, larval razorback <br />suckers in the Green River were first captured 20-30 d after initiation of spawning, which <br />generally coincided with a relatively steep and consistent increase in discharge associated with <br />the beginning of spring runoff, and numbers collected had usually peaked by early or mid-June, <br />The present existence of razorback sucker populations in the Green River is tenuous, and <br />immediate conservation measures are needed if the species is to persist. Management actions of <br />the Colorado River Recovery Implementation Program to recover the endangered fishes include a <br />combination of restoration of natural habitats, nonnative fish control, augmentation of wild <br />populations, protection offish in refugia, and monitoring of populations and habitats. We <br />documented annual reproduction by razorback suckers but mortality of larvae was apparently <br />high. Predation on razorback sucker early life stages by nonnative fishes is considered a serious <br />threat to populations (Bestgen 1990; Minckley et al. 1991; USFWS 1997), and concerns exist <br />within the Colorado River Recovery Implementation Program about the effects of degraded <br />water quality (e.g" increased concentrations of selenium) on razorback sucker reproduction and <br />larval survival (Hamilton and Waddell 1994; Hamilton 1998; Hamilton et al. 1998). Restoring <br />access to warm, productive floodplain wetlands to serve as growth and conditioning habitats <br />holds promise for razorback sucker recovery, but much remains to be learned about fish <br />population and community responses to individual and collective management actions. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />1. Development of an effective standardized monitoring program for razorback suckers in <br />the Green River is progressing and requires continued flexibility in application and <br />evaluation of sampling methods, data analysis, and overall scope of the program to ensure <br />that population indices are valid indicators of trends and responses to management <br />actions. <br />2. Light traps set overnight in quiet-water habitats are effective for capturing larval <br />razorback suckers to document reproduction and monitor when larvae are transported <br />downstream from spawning areas. However, studies are needed to directly assess the <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.