Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />Quantified recovery goals for the four federally-listed Colorado River fish <br />species- Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, razorback sucker, and bony tail, <br />are recognized as vital benchmarks to guide progress and define endpoints within <br />the recovery program. Recovery criteria are identified using population <br />parameters that can be determined or estimated annually from field data using <br />consistent methodology. The premise of this approach is that the fish data <br />available from standardized monitoring and population estimation sampling is <br />sufficient to develop measurable goals for down listing and delisting. The focus of <br />recovery goal development is the inclusion of populations of the listed fishes and <br />their habitat where a potential for persistence appears feasible based on existing <br />biological data. <br /> <br />The over-riding criterion defining recovery is that these populations are <br />maintained through recruitment of young fish generated from natural reproduction <br />in the wild. Other biological criteria used to define recovery include number of <br />populations, distribution, abundance, recruitment to the adult population, and <br />population structure. The goals for these criteria are intended to describe viable, <br />self-sustaining populations with successful reproduction, survival and growth. The <br />goals for number of populations, distribution and abundance criteria meet minimum <br />genetic viability standards, promote genetic diversity and demographic stability, <br />and reduce impacts from potential catastrophic population reduction or loss. <br />Distribution, recruitment and population size structure (length frequency <br />distribution) criteria describe dynamic processes of annual reproduction, survival of <br />year classes, and dispersal of fish throughout their habitat. The abundance trend <br />criterion and the range and frequency attributes of the recruitment and population <br />size structure criteria describe stability yet recognize natural population level <br />dynamics and variability. <br /> <br />Population estimates and length frequency distributions were developed for <br />all riverine populations of the endangered fish species from 1991-1997, if data <br />were available, for the purpose of determining current status and trends in these <br />populations and examining variability in population parameters over time. This <br />data was compared to results of other studies when possible, and used to examine. <br />recovery goals in context with estimates derived from empirical data or models. <br /> <br />Only biological recovery goals are presented. If the populations of listed <br />fish species are documented to be meeting these criteria for delisting, then it is <br />reasonable to assume that the necessary habitats and ecological requirements are <br />in place to maintain these populations. As a result of the 8-12 year abundance <br />trend delisting requirement that portrays population stability over a generation time, <br />it is also reasonable to assume that the five listing factors addressing threats are <br />being adequately mitigated in the current environment. The recovery goals not <br />presented are the institutional mechanisms whereby the above environment is <br /> <br />iv <br />