Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Osmundson and Burnham (1996) as part of the lower estimate and Appendix <br />Table A-1 as part of the upper estimate. <br /> <br />From the densities estimated in Table A-1, the Green River mainstem is <br />capable of supporting a minimum population of 2,700 Colorado pikeminnow at4.6 <br />fish/mi., or even a population of 5,800 fish at 10 fish/mi. On the other hand, the <br />Yampa and White rivers appear to support much lower densities. These tributary <br />populations are linked genetically with Green River population based on the mixing <br />of spawning fish from each population at the Yampa and Desolation-Gray Canyon <br />spawning sites and the dispersal and recruitment of fish to all three populations <br />from the same Green River nursery habitats. They are relatively small adult <br />populations that are unlikely to be able to maintain genetic diversity without this <br />link to the larger Green River population. The Colorado-Gunnison river system <br />may be able to support a population of 2,700 adult Colorado pikeminnow at a <br />density of 8.9 fish/mi., but is more likely capable of supporting a population in the <br />1,500-2,000 range. This is feasible if Ne=500 and NJN=0.5, resulting in a required <br />population size of 1,300-1,600 fish. Based on the two feasible sex ratios and Ne of <br />1,000, the San Juan does not appear likely to be able to support a population of <br />much more than 2,250 fish at 10.1 fish/mi. If one accepts that the San Juan <br />system is similar to the Colorado River in that its Colorado pikeminnow population <br />would be distributed as an upstream adult population and a downstream <br />nursery/juvenile population, and that the carrying capacity of the San Juan is more <br />similar to the Yampa and White rivers, then it should not be expected to support an <br />adult population of more than 1,000-1,300 fish. This target population range does <br />satisfy the lower Ne criterion of 500 fish. If 2,700 adult fish is a minimum <br />population required for Colorado pikeminnow to maintain a genetically viable <br />population, then the prospects for recovery of the San Juan population are <br />diminished. However, the population characteristics of the pikeminnow population <br />that affect the population size necessary to maintain Ne are not confirmed in <br />research. <br /> <br />Given the above genetic considerations, it is proposed to further augment <br />the downlisting and delisting requirements for population abundance for each <br />population by adding a buffer equal to the annual mortality rate of 14%. This <br />results in population abundance minimums of 3,100 adult fish in the Green River, . <br />1,600 fish in the Colorado River, and 1,200 fish in the San Juan River. <br />Considering the available habitat in river miles, these abundance minimums equal <br />5.3-5.4 fish/river mile for all three subbasins. For each population, adult fish size is <br />defined as ~350 mm, and the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval must <br />be equal to or less than 50% of the point estimate. This means the lower end of <br />the confidence interval around these point estimates must be ~1,550 fish for the <br />Green, ~800 fish for the Colorado, and ~600 fish for the San Juan. Two of the <br />three populations must meet this abundance requirement. By way of comparison, <br />existing low end confidence intervals for the population estimates in Table A-1 are <br />30-55% of the point estimates for the Green River, 40-48% for the White River, 46- <br />53% for the Yampa River, and 21-36% for the Colorado River. Using the <br /> <br />13 <br />