Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />increasing (White, Green) over the 6-7 year estimation period (Figures 1-4). The <br />yearly changes are not likely statistically significant for any of these rivers given <br />overlapping 95% confidence intervals ranging from 21-150% of the point estimate <br />(Table A-1). The larger populations appear in the Green (2,000-7,400 approx.) <br />and the Colorado rivers (900-1,200 approx.). Numbers of Colorado pikeminnow <br />per river mile range from 4.8-8.6 on the Colorado River and 6.1-22.2 on the Green <br />River. For the tributary rivers, the White and Yampa, Colorado pikeminnow <br />populations appear similar in size, and significantly smaller in size and density <br />compared to the Green and Colorado rivers. Tributary fish population numbers <br />range from 180-550 fish and 1.8-5.4 fish/mile on the White River and 120-260 fish <br />2.3-5.0 fish/mile on the Yampa. For the Green and Colorado rivers, the ratio of <br />recaptured/captured fish increased over the 1991-97 estimation period, while the <br />ratios for the White and Yampa rivers varied with no trend apparent. A significant <br />attribute of the Yampa population estimation is the exclusion of the Yampa Canyon <br />reach, comprising the lower 45 river miles. This was necessary since the mark- <br />recapture data available from that reach was collected almost exclusively during <br />the migration-spawning period, which involves adult fish from the Green, White <br />and Yampa rivers. The presence and size of an adult pikeminnow population in <br />the lower Yampa is uncertain. <br /> <br />The only comparison of population abundance available comes from <br />Osmundson and Burnham (1996) and unpublished data in Osmundson (1999, in <br />review). For the Colorado River population of pikeminnow, their estimates (and <br />95% confidence intervals) were 1992-535 fish (320-1594), 1993-675 fish (464- <br />1367), and 1994-629 fish (393-1245). These are 39-47% lower than the estimates <br />derived here. In 1998-99, Osmundson (2000, in press) estimated the Colorado <br />River population at 730-800 fish, suggestive of further increases in population <br />abundance through the 1990s. The authors did not provide 95% confidence <br />intervals for the combined abundance estimates for the upper and lower reaches, <br />so they were approximated using the coefficients of variation evident from the <br />available standard errors and confidence intervals. These interval estimates <br />overlap with those calculated in Table A-1, and the upper confidence intervals <br />estimated from Osmundson and Burnham (1996) include the point estimates here. <br />While the 1992-94 estimates here suggest a steady increase, those of Osmundson <br />and Burnham (1996) peak in 1993. <br /> <br />Catch per unit effort data for the Yampa, Colorado, White and Green rivers <br />all indicate steady increases in Colorado pikeminnow abundance since 1991 <br />(McAda et al. 1998) <br /> <br />Length frequency distributions for these Colorado pikeminnow populations <br />(Figures 5-8, Appendix Table A-3) reflect stable size structures with the influence <br />of variable year class strength apparent in the number, magnitude, and location of <br />the peaks. Attributes of stability are the consistent presence of both small and <br />large fish and modal peaks occurring mid-range. No continual or persistent shift of <br />the frequency distribution to the right (lack of recruitment) or left (selective mortality <br />