My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9498
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9498
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9498
Author
Nesler, T. P.
Title
Stocking Plan for Endangered Coloraod River Fish Species.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />under the present circumstances of low to non-existent population numbers. Attempted spawning <br />and the production of viable eggs and larvae by these stocked populations will constitute the first <br />step in conversion to desired natural function and self-sustaining status for these stocked <br />populations. <br /> <br />For razorback sucker and bonytail, no other recovery action provides an effective and <br />timely means of restoring wild populations in those river reaches designated within the Genetics <br />Management Plan. Success in achieving these stocking objectives could result in the establishment <br />of 1-2 bonytail populations where there are presently none; and 1-3 razorback sucker populations <br />in the Colorado River to complement the existing two in the middle and lower reaches of the <br />Green River. For Colorado pikeminnow, success would result in expansion of the Colorado River <br />population with potentially new distinct spawning aggregations in Debeque Canyon of the <br />Colorado River and in Dominguez Canyon in the Gunnison River. Construction of fish passage <br />structures on the Colorado River to achieve connection and dispersal similar to that observed at <br />Redlands on the Gunnison River remains a critical component of recovery actions necessary to <br />complement restoration. stocking. <br /> <br />Stocking Plan Summary <br /> <br />The stocking plan is presented for each species by river reach, and by fish size and season <br />in which stocking will occur over a seven to nine-year period. Numbers of fish required via <br />propagation for stocking are presented in Table 1 for each species and river reach described by <br />fish size, season, number of fish stocked annually and number of years stocked. It is proposed <br />that restoration stocking is desirable for three of the endangered Colorado River fishes (listed in <br />priority): razorback sucker, bonytail, and Colorado pikeminncw. Table 2 provides the <br />survivorship curves used to back-calculate from the target numbers proposed as an objective for <br />each species to detennine numbers of fish needed at each agel size. These survival rates and fish <br />sizes were estimated in Ryden (1997) and Wydoski (1996) for a hatchery environment, and further <br />modified and adapted by the Upper Colorado River Recovery Biology Committee on 09/26/2001 <br />for use in stocking plans for Colorado and Utah. The Committee recognizes these survival rates <br />may underestimate natural survival and, therefore, the numbers of fish needed to meet stocking <br />objective endpoints in a wild setting. Due to the uncertainty in survival, a buffer equal to the <br />presumed annual adult mortality in the wild was added to the draft recovery goal abundance <br />criterion for each species to detennine the target stocking number objectives. The goal of stocking <br />for each species is the establishment of a multiple-age group population of a desired abundance <br />level in each location. Stocking would be conducted over the seven to nine-year period as shown <br />in order to meet these criteria, but would be modified by numbers stocked, size, season, or <br />location based on monitoring results. An evaluation of the monitoring data followmg the <br />completion of the stocking should be accomplished to mtegrate the annual results. These stocking <br />objectives may also be modified m the future based on any revisions made to the draft recovery <br />goal abundance criteria during the fmal review process currently underway. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.